10-29-2005, 06:41 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-PC Guleria+Oct 29 2005, 03:20 PM-->QUOTE(PC Guleria @ Oct 29 2005, 03:20 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->.Â
wrote
[/color]
[right][snapback]40262[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Mr Guleria
Do you wish to start a separate thread.
If the moderators wish to allow it?
The Rajput phenomena and the Islamic phenomena is linked. Prior to the 12 century, we do not find the term Rajput used in an ethnic sense.
There is plenty of material about this on the Jathistory list, and there have been plenty dicussions about it too. The material in book form, is in the files section, whichi is accessible to mebers only.
Are you a member?
If not, you are welcome to join, ad you do not need another identity either?
One that stands out is the Rajput- Islamic alliance, and the Rajputs acting as their contractors to conquer Bharat for them, and not as defenders of Bharat.
Could you stay off the histrionics?.
Ravi Chaudhary
wrote
[/color]
[right][snapback]40262[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Mr Guleria
Do you wish to start a separate thread.
If the moderators wish to allow it?
The Rajput phenomena and the Islamic phenomena is linked. Prior to the 12 century, we do not find the term Rajput used in an ethnic sense.
There is plenty of material about this on the Jathistory list, and there have been plenty dicussions about it too. The material in book form, is in the files section, whichi is accessible to mebers only.
Are you a member?
If not, you are welcome to join, ad you do not need another identity either?
One that stands out is the Rajput- Islamic alliance, and the Rajputs acting as their contractors to conquer Bharat for them, and not as defenders of Bharat.
Could you stay off the histrionics?.
Ravi Chaudhary