12-20-2005, 09:12 AM
Sunder,
Nice writeup on Gangesha!
I had a book on analysis of Gangesha's navya-nyAya, and I started to read it but didn't complete. All I remember is being very impressed.
Just a couple of comments:
1. pramANa-vAda sounds very much like epistemology.
2. Where he uses the dual of 'pramA' as right knowledge and 'brahma' as wrong knowledge, I think brahma is wrongly spelled. It should be "bhrama". As brahma and bhrama are poles apart! (like brahma and mAyA). Reminded me of a nice gentleman from Punjab who used to pronounce brahma as bhrama, which put me into a bit of confusion at first. <!--emo&
--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile.gif' /><!--endemo-->
Nice writeup on Gangesha!
I had a book on analysis of Gangesha's navya-nyAya, and I started to read it but didn't complete. All I remember is being very impressed.
Just a couple of comments:
1. pramANa-vAda sounds very much like epistemology.
2. Where he uses the dual of 'pramA' as right knowledge and 'brahma' as wrong knowledge, I think brahma is wrongly spelled. It should be "bhrama". As brahma and bhrama are poles apart! (like brahma and mAyA). Reminded me of a nice gentleman from Punjab who used to pronounce brahma as bhrama, which put me into a bit of confusion at first. <!--emo&
