Western Indologists

[Hauma Hamiddha]

Most modern Western Indologists and their sepoys have similar roles as their colonial counterpart. In the past colonialism was directly effected by the presence of the white man in the colonies. These days it is done more subtly and in long distance. As result the Indologist has also become a master of subterfuge and deceit. He protests against accusations of "racism" and tries to put on Indian facades like the romAka brAhmaNa, but beneath s/he is the same. He continues to exploit the same allies: the avarNas and Dravidianists. The Malhotran U-turn theory explains much of the genesis and evolution of these academics. In fact this must be studied in the much larger context of why the US universities allowed leftism to flourish while firmly eliminating it from the political scene and other areas of public life. Academic Indologists and leftists are the like the virus harbored by wasps for deployment against targets for pyscops. The Califoria book affair shows that the modern Indologist serves the Anglosphere (or rather the more inclusive Leukosphere) in no different a way from the archaic versions operating in India of the Raj.

Given this it is hardly surprising that Bryant is cautious, lest his stomach go empty.

This said it does not mean we should ignore all what they produce, just as we wisely did not ignore everything of the Industrial revultion because of its Anglical antecedents.