01-23-2006, 09:00 AM
GS
Even if the literature is Sangh I am ok with it.
Regarding the stuff you have already posted I am not sure what it proves. I had read this a long time ago (dont remember all of it). I think his thrust is that xtianity was ok, its the xtians who were perverts. I have found this theme across a lot of his writings. That is why I dont understand why he chose buddhism and not xtianity. Any reference will be helpful.
Thanks.
Even if the literature is Sangh I am ok with it.
Regarding the stuff you have already posted I am not sure what it proves. I had read this a long time ago (dont remember all of it). I think his thrust is that xtianity was ok, its the xtians who were perverts. I have found this theme across a lot of his writings. That is why I dont understand why he chose buddhism and not xtianity. Any reference will be helpful.
Thanks.