01-28-2006, 10:03 PM
On Madhav Deshpande, (came via email):
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->namo namaH,
I am going through shaunakiiyaa caturaadhyaayikaa by Madhav M.
Deshpande, Harvard Oriental Series volume 52, Edited by Michael
Witzel
I am utterly shocked and disgusted to find a string "[Pseudo]-"
prefixed to saayaNa in some places e.g. p323 in the note to 2.2.17
reads
<!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->
..
One should also note that the commentary of [Pseudo]-Sayana adopts ..
..
as for as my reading of [Pseudo]-Sayana's commentary goes,....
...
it is likely that [Pseudo]-Sayana have had no access to this text.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
couple of points for now:
1. As veda recitation has always been an oral tradiiton, the
presumption that saayaNa used written text is prima facia absurd.
2. In the interest of propriety, It should be stated that a great
vedaacaarya saayaNa did live during king bukka's regime and wrote
bhaashhya on almost all of sa.nhitaa, braahmaNa, aaraNyaka.
so the prefix [Pseudo] witha capital 'P' is unwarranted. I had
expected a much higher standard from Harvard.
About the book itself: consists of about 60% recycled Whitney
quotations with ample praises to Whitney (looks like the same idiot
Whitney who was never able to understand a word of tai. pr. and made
a
lousy mess of it making his book utterly unreadable) and a bit of
suuryakaanta bashing
aa no bhadraaH kratavo yantu vishvataH
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->namo namaH,
I am going through shaunakiiyaa caturaadhyaayikaa by Madhav M.
Deshpande, Harvard Oriental Series volume 52, Edited by Michael
Witzel
I am utterly shocked and disgusted to find a string "[Pseudo]-"
prefixed to saayaNa in some places e.g. p323 in the note to 2.2.17
reads
<!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->
..
One should also note that the commentary of [Pseudo]-Sayana adopts ..
..
as for as my reading of [Pseudo]-Sayana's commentary goes,....
...
it is likely that [Pseudo]-Sayana have had no access to this text.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
couple of points for now:
1. As veda recitation has always been an oral tradiiton, the
presumption that saayaNa used written text is prima facia absurd.
2. In the interest of propriety, It should be stated that a great
vedaacaarya saayaNa did live during king bukka's regime and wrote
bhaashhya on almost all of sa.nhitaa, braahmaNa, aaraNyaka.
so the prefix [Pseudo] witha capital 'P' is unwarranted. I had
expected a much higher standard from Harvard.
About the book itself: consists of about 60% recycled Whitney
quotations with ample praises to Whitney (looks like the same idiot
Whitney who was never able to understand a word of tai. pr. and made
a
lousy mess of it making his book utterly unreadable) and a bit of
suuryakaanta bashing
aa no bhadraaH kratavo yantu vishvataH
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->