05-14-2006, 03:08 PM
sorry husky you are full of crap.
i have been all over north india but no one calls it shivA or ramA or bhimA.
and wicca is not an english word its not germanic at all, its celtic. witch is the germanic derivative of wicca.
the word druid has jack in common with dravid. druid = dru (immerse) + vid (knowledge).
and Eire DOES come from arya. as does iran/arian. as much as raja, rex and regal come from the same root word.
of all european languages, lithuanian DOES have the most in common with sanskrit.
and hinduism was formed in whats today punjab-haryana (ie, thets where vedas were written) and all treatises were in sanskrit, all epics including the gita were in sanskrit, and based in uttar pradesh for the most part, hanuman and other monkeys were characters based on tribals/vanars and arya varta, as per the purans was indeed the triangular area north of vindhyas. i believe the purans a lot more than some (im)poster on the net, whose moniker is actually the name of a hairy breed of dog. much as you imagine that aryavarta extended right up to sri lanka, it simply isnt true. and much as you imagine south india was hindu right from the day the Rg Ved was written, that too isnt true. its posted many times in this forum (and corroborated by http://voiceofdharma.org/books/rig/ch6.htm) that iranians were a renegade sort of people, who fought with the vedic aryans (all aryans are non-tribal north indians and iranians) and went west with their own version of the veds, later forming zoroastrianism.
some people are too dense to see the obvious and too spineless to accept facts.
i have been all over north india but no one calls it shivA or ramA or bhimA.
and wicca is not an english word its not germanic at all, its celtic. witch is the germanic derivative of wicca.
the word druid has jack in common with dravid. druid = dru (immerse) + vid (knowledge).
and Eire DOES come from arya. as does iran/arian. as much as raja, rex and regal come from the same root word.
of all european languages, lithuanian DOES have the most in common with sanskrit.
and hinduism was formed in whats today punjab-haryana (ie, thets where vedas were written) and all treatises were in sanskrit, all epics including the gita were in sanskrit, and based in uttar pradesh for the most part, hanuman and other monkeys were characters based on tribals/vanars and arya varta, as per the purans was indeed the triangular area north of vindhyas. i believe the purans a lot more than some (im)poster on the net, whose moniker is actually the name of a hairy breed of dog. much as you imagine that aryavarta extended right up to sri lanka, it simply isnt true. and much as you imagine south india was hindu right from the day the Rg Ved was written, that too isnt true. its posted many times in this forum (and corroborated by http://voiceofdharma.org/books/rig/ch6.htm) that iranians were a renegade sort of people, who fought with the vedic aryans (all aryans are non-tribal north indians and iranians) and went west with their own version of the veds, later forming zoroastrianism.
some people are too dense to see the obvious and too spineless to accept facts.