05-17-2006, 12:59 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->"Jats are no foreginers they are Indians and don't hate them when they try to present their point of view when jatt history is being discussed on Indian discussion forum."<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Agreed but there are certain Jats who feel more close to someone from middle east & central Asia (after living thousands of years in India) compared to somone from Gujrat, Madhya pradesh and down south.
Regarding their version of History, can't they prove their greatness without abusing Brahmins & Rajputs and riddiculing Hindusim.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->I don't need to remind you the jat regiment the sikh regiment and a part of rajput regiment is filled with those jatt soldiers who are shedding their blood for their motherland.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
We all know that. But people like RAvi Choudhuri will say that they are being used by Brahmins.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Try to prove your version of jatt history if you think their version is wrong.
We must concentrate on substance not on invectives.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Could you please tell us how Khap records become a valid proof while Puranas have no validity. Why don't you visit supreme seat of history i.e. Jat History forum. If one goes by logic on JAt history forum than Aalah-Udal story sung in the regions of Bundel khand too becomes history. Where just two of them defeated the army of Ray Pithora (Pritvi Raj Chouhan).
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->We can't deny the facts that these muslim historians seems to mention more of jats in their early enconter with Indian people.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Seems to whom?.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->I request Delete not to indulge in indidual cases but concentrate on jat history as the thread suggests.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I am concentrating exactly on that. After all what is Jat history other than the transformation of the ego of the Jats suffering from inferiorty complex which makes them to negate their Indian identity.
"Delete": Please PM or one of the moderators a human sounding username. -Admin
Agreed but there are certain Jats who feel more close to someone from middle east & central Asia (after living thousands of years in India) compared to somone from Gujrat, Madhya pradesh and down south.
Regarding their version of History, can't they prove their greatness without abusing Brahmins & Rajputs and riddiculing Hindusim.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->I don't need to remind you the jat regiment the sikh regiment and a part of rajput regiment is filled with those jatt soldiers who are shedding their blood for their motherland.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
We all know that. But people like RAvi Choudhuri will say that they are being used by Brahmins.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Try to prove your version of jatt history if you think their version is wrong.
We must concentrate on substance not on invectives.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Could you please tell us how Khap records become a valid proof while Puranas have no validity. Why don't you visit supreme seat of history i.e. Jat History forum. If one goes by logic on JAt history forum than Aalah-Udal story sung in the regions of Bundel khand too becomes history. Where just two of them defeated the army of Ray Pithora (Pritvi Raj Chouhan).
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->We can't deny the facts that these muslim historians seems to mention more of jats in their early enconter with Indian people.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Seems to whom?.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->I request Delete not to indulge in indidual cases but concentrate on jat history as the thread suggests.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I am concentrating exactly on that. After all what is Jat history other than the transformation of the ego of the Jats suffering from inferiorty complex which makes them to negate their Indian identity.
"Delete": Please PM or one of the moderators a human sounding username. -Admin