Australasian news:
http://au.yahoo.com/
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->PM expresses sorrow over India blasts
AAP- Howard expresses his sympathies for people of India after a terror attack in Mumbai.
<b>Indian train bomb toll hits 190</b>
(video) Terror attack in India<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Msn NZ:
Indian Police Pick Through Bomb-hit Mumbai
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Pakistan, which denies Indian charges of tacit support for the militants, condemned what it labelled a "terrorist attack".
...
The Mumbai explosions brought worldwide expressions of outrage including from Washington and arch rival Pakistan.
Pakistani Foreign Minister Khurseed Mehmood Kasuri told Reuters in Washington that the blasts underlined the need for Pakistan and India to resolve their disputes.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
A bit too transparent there Mehmood. The readers might know you're hinting that your two-bit country was involved: "blasts underlined the need for P & I to resolve disputes" (aka "give in to all the Islamic requirements of Indian and Pak Muslims"). If Pak was not involved, why say this? Did the US say the blasts underlined the need for US & I to resolve disputes? No? That's because the US wasn't involved.
Scores Killed In Mumbai Train Blasts
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->By Krittivas Mukherjee
...
<b>Srinagar Violence</b>
...
Kashmir has been split between India and Pakistan since shortly after the two countries gained independence from Britain in 1947, but both claim it in full.
Pakistan's Foreign Ministry issued a statement saying that President Pervez Musharraf and Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz strongly condemned the "terrorist attack" in Mumbai.
Mumbai, a metropolis of about 17 million formerly known as Bombay, has been hit by bomb blasts <b>in the past decade</b>.
More than 250 people died in a string of bomb explosions in the city in 1993 for which authorities blamed the city's underworld criminal gangs. Those attacks <b>followed the demolition of a mosque in the Hindu holy city of Ayodhya</b>.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Krittivas Treacherous Mukherjee - infuses an excuse for the Islamic Terrorists in the final para, so as to make this act of terrorism (16 years since the crappy usurping mosque in Ayodhya got its deserved reward) appear like just desserts in the readers' minds.
--- News brought to you by Ze Global Christian Media, working with our friends the Muslims of India (Christian and Muslim minority, Hindu majority), fighting our enemies the Muslims of the Middle-east (Christian minority, Islamic majority) to bring you unadulterated, honest-to-Jehova news! (We'll take all the Krittivas Mukherjees that India can toss our way) ---
Compelled to wonder: when the WTC was attacked by the Islamic terrorists, why didn't the Christian Media immediately write articles that ended on a final para informing its readers that the US had caused trouble in Libya & Lebannon, set up the dictatorship in Iraq and the Tban in Afghanistan and then dumped them when there was no use anymore? Why didn't they mention in the final para that with the US help, Iraq waged war against Iran and murdered many Iraqis and Iranians? And that the women of Afghanistan owe their life-imprisonment to the Tban whom the Jehova-fearing US created?
Come to it, <b>why didn't the last paragraphs of news detailing the WTC attack recap the Crusades?</b> Ayodhya was 16 years ago (and many terrorist strikes later), Crusades was several centuries ago - both should be admissible since time is no object. They're trying to argue for 'just retaliation', right? Yes "secular" Christian Media, please mention the Crusades when any mention is made of the WTC, London bombings, Madrid, Italy from now on.
http://au.yahoo.com/
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->PM expresses sorrow over India blasts
AAP- Howard expresses his sympathies for people of India after a terror attack in Mumbai.
<b>Indian train bomb toll hits 190</b>
(video) Terror attack in India<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Msn NZ:
Indian Police Pick Through Bomb-hit Mumbai
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Pakistan, which denies Indian charges of tacit support for the militants, condemned what it labelled a "terrorist attack".
...
The Mumbai explosions brought worldwide expressions of outrage including from Washington and arch rival Pakistan.
Pakistani Foreign Minister Khurseed Mehmood Kasuri told Reuters in Washington that the blasts underlined the need for Pakistan and India to resolve their disputes.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
A bit too transparent there Mehmood. The readers might know you're hinting that your two-bit country was involved: "blasts underlined the need for P & I to resolve disputes" (aka "give in to all the Islamic requirements of Indian and Pak Muslims"). If Pak was not involved, why say this? Did the US say the blasts underlined the need for US & I to resolve disputes? No? That's because the US wasn't involved.
Scores Killed In Mumbai Train Blasts
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->By Krittivas Mukherjee
...
<b>Srinagar Violence</b>
...
Kashmir has been split between India and Pakistan since shortly after the two countries gained independence from Britain in 1947, but both claim it in full.
Pakistan's Foreign Ministry issued a statement saying that President Pervez Musharraf and Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz strongly condemned the "terrorist attack" in Mumbai.
Mumbai, a metropolis of about 17 million formerly known as Bombay, has been hit by bomb blasts <b>in the past decade</b>.
More than 250 people died in a string of bomb explosions in the city in 1993 for which authorities blamed the city's underworld criminal gangs. Those attacks <b>followed the demolition of a mosque in the Hindu holy city of Ayodhya</b>.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Krittivas Treacherous Mukherjee - infuses an excuse for the Islamic Terrorists in the final para, so as to make this act of terrorism (16 years since the crappy usurping mosque in Ayodhya got its deserved reward) appear like just desserts in the readers' minds.
--- News brought to you by Ze Global Christian Media, working with our friends the Muslims of India (Christian and Muslim minority, Hindu majority), fighting our enemies the Muslims of the Middle-east (Christian minority, Islamic majority) to bring you unadulterated, honest-to-Jehova news! (We'll take all the Krittivas Mukherjees that India can toss our way) ---
Compelled to wonder: when the WTC was attacked by the Islamic terrorists, why didn't the Christian Media immediately write articles that ended on a final para informing its readers that the US had caused trouble in Libya & Lebannon, set up the dictatorship in Iraq and the Tban in Afghanistan and then dumped them when there was no use anymore? Why didn't they mention in the final para that with the US help, Iraq waged war against Iran and murdered many Iraqis and Iranians? And that the women of Afghanistan owe their life-imprisonment to the Tban whom the Jehova-fearing US created?
Come to it, <b>why didn't the last paragraphs of news detailing the WTC attack recap the Crusades?</b> Ayodhya was 16 years ago (and many terrorist strikes later), Crusades was several centuries ago - both should be admissible since time is no object. They're trying to argue for 'just retaliation', right? Yes "secular" Christian Media, please mention the Crusades when any mention is made of the WTC, London bombings, Madrid, Italy from now on.