07-13-2006, 01:30 AM
Bharatvarsh,
I agree that indifference is being interpreted as resilience. I read a bunch of headlines saying that the terrorists wanted to forment riots, basically suggesting that Hindus should do nothing. Hindus should make Islam and its Ummah pay regardless of the objectives of the jihadis. Sometimes the right action and the enemy's goals may intersect, but that in no way should stop us from acting in our own defence. By applying their third rate argument to other situations, India should not have recaptured the peaks of Kargil, because the jihadis wanted confilct, and maybe we shouldn't have disrupted operation Gibralter either, since the Porkistanis wanted war, and why fight Germany for Poland since Hitler desired war? Illogical rubbish! The jihadist want to kill as many kafirs as possible and put the fear of Allah in to the kafir, all in the pursuit of objectives clearly defined by Islam. So if they want war, let's give them one.
I agree that indifference is being interpreted as resilience. I read a bunch of headlines saying that the terrorists wanted to forment riots, basically suggesting that Hindus should do nothing. Hindus should make Islam and its Ummah pay regardless of the objectives of the jihadis. Sometimes the right action and the enemy's goals may intersect, but that in no way should stop us from acting in our own defence. By applying their third rate argument to other situations, India should not have recaptured the peaks of Kargil, because the jihadis wanted confilct, and maybe we shouldn't have disrupted operation Gibralter either, since the Porkistanis wanted war, and why fight Germany for Poland since Hitler desired war? Illogical rubbish! The jihadist want to kill as many kafirs as possible and put the fear of Allah in to the kafir, all in the pursuit of objectives clearly defined by Islam. So if they want war, let's give them one.