07-13-2006, 01:56 PM
How would a Hindu Counter Terror operate? What would be the methods of training, recruiting, and targeting? How would they prevent themselves from being penetrated?
Who would they target?
I think the threat of foreign intervention is exagerrated at best, and parnoia at worst. Which nation has the capability or the will (both of leadership and populace) to intervene in an Indian civil war. Yes I am aware of RISA, IER, and Indologists, but it is one thing to change the pages of Wikipedia, and quite another to convice their population and leadership to go to war.
The alliance between Islam and Leftist is not new, nor is it unique to India. If we have to deal with RISA, IER, AID, ... the West has to deal with MoveOn, Socialists, CAIR, and many other groups too. There are leftists in other countries who demonize people that speak out against Islam. Here is an intersting article:
http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2006/06/...revenge-of.html
As far as the coverage on post Godhra or Ayodhya is concerned, the Western press takes its cue from the Indian press, and repeats what the latter says. The Western press stopped covering the Gujarat riots after the first few weeks; it is only the Indian press who are continuing it ad nauseum. Also, one more phenomenon is the dhimmitude of media in general, which shows a pro-muslim bias in every event. That too is not limited to coverage of Hindu-Muslim situation, you can see this bias in Israeli-Palestinian, Serb-Muslim, Russian-Chechnya, and America-Iraq situations (remember the Abu Garaib and Guantanamo prisons being compared to concentration camps?)
The Islamic propaganda is nothing new, and it is carried out against India, Russia, Israel, America, and many other countries and peoples.
Whether Russia gets its former allies on its side is irrelevant, its main hurdle to becoming a super power is its economy.
There was a lot of hue and cry about China "stealing" the body parts in the mid 90's too, but that is part of the game. If you want China to give you some concessions in trade negotiations, then you raise the human rights bogey. That's business as usual, not a signal that someone is going to take some armed action against China.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--> About Christianity, notice how many South American countries are starting to evict US missionaries for being spies?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Precisely, they are taking bold action because they know that US is not going to retaliate against them.
The point is China has killed millions of people (including muslims), but no one will risk their own cities for Uigur (Turkic) Muslims. Same with Russia wiping out 10% of Chechen Muslims. This paralysing fear of fragmentation, and chaining unconnected events are unjustified.
Who would they target?
I think the threat of foreign intervention is exagerrated at best, and parnoia at worst. Which nation has the capability or the will (both of leadership and populace) to intervene in an Indian civil war. Yes I am aware of RISA, IER, and Indologists, but it is one thing to change the pages of Wikipedia, and quite another to convice their population and leadership to go to war.
The alliance between Islam and Leftist is not new, nor is it unique to India. If we have to deal with RISA, IER, AID, ... the West has to deal with MoveOn, Socialists, CAIR, and many other groups too. There are leftists in other countries who demonize people that speak out against Islam. Here is an intersting article:
http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2006/06/...revenge-of.html
As far as the coverage on post Godhra or Ayodhya is concerned, the Western press takes its cue from the Indian press, and repeats what the latter says. The Western press stopped covering the Gujarat riots after the first few weeks; it is only the Indian press who are continuing it ad nauseum. Also, one more phenomenon is the dhimmitude of media in general, which shows a pro-muslim bias in every event. That too is not limited to coverage of Hindu-Muslim situation, you can see this bias in Israeli-Palestinian, Serb-Muslim, Russian-Chechnya, and America-Iraq situations (remember the Abu Garaib and Guantanamo prisons being compared to concentration camps?)
The Islamic propaganda is nothing new, and it is carried out against India, Russia, Israel, America, and many other countries and peoples.
Whether Russia gets its former allies on its side is irrelevant, its main hurdle to becoming a super power is its economy.
There was a lot of hue and cry about China "stealing" the body parts in the mid 90's too, but that is part of the game. If you want China to give you some concessions in trade negotiations, then you raise the human rights bogey. That's business as usual, not a signal that someone is going to take some armed action against China.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--> About Christianity, notice how many South American countries are starting to evict US missionaries for being spies?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Precisely, they are taking bold action because they know that US is not going to retaliate against them.
The point is China has killed millions of people (including muslims), but no one will risk their own cities for Uigur (Turkic) Muslims. Same with Russia wiping out 10% of Chechen Muslims. This paralysing fear of fragmentation, and chaining unconnected events are unjustified.