Well, read the example case of Yugoslavia here:
http://www.india-forum.com/forums/index.ph...st=0#entry53621
The US used the media to show massacres of ethnic Albanians by Serbs (later shown to be false) to precipitate their intervention in Yugoslavia.
It shows how the US used the internal dissension between groups (Croatians who are Catholic, Albanian Muslims and Serbians who are Orthodox who have bad blood between them since the former 2 massacred the latter during WWII) to break Yugoslavia. (Helps to get closer to the oil, since the uncooperative Serbs didn't give the US access before, but now the US can get through Croatia and Bosniac which is terrorised by Islam).
The international media blitz on the demonised Serbs allowed them to get viewers' consent to 'intervene' in Yugoslavia.
They armed and trained the Croatians and Albanians, both of whom had been part of the Nazi side during WWII.
Several news sources (not AAP or Reuters) regularly wrote about how the CIA set up fronts in Eastern-Europe. Many Eastern-European demonstrations against pro-Russian governments that one sees on the news (Ukraine, Georgia, now Belarus) turn out to be manufactured. The pro-European government that is elected is often due to an entirely rigged election, as many Eastern-Europeans have complained (see anti-war). Even the heads of the elected pro-European governments (I think this was in Georgia?) said that they did nothing to get elected and that the US had intervened to make them win. So they felt there should be a re-election.
Now the funny thing is that in Belarus, the recent election worked out correctly with a pro-Russian government winning legally. Then, not long after, the tv news shows how "protesters" are saying this legitimate election was rigged and want a re-election.
http://www.india-forum.com/forums/index.ph...st=0#entry53621
The US used the media to show massacres of ethnic Albanians by Serbs (later shown to be false) to precipitate their intervention in Yugoslavia.
It shows how the US used the internal dissension between groups (Croatians who are Catholic, Albanian Muslims and Serbians who are Orthodox who have bad blood between them since the former 2 massacred the latter during WWII) to break Yugoslavia. (Helps to get closer to the oil, since the uncooperative Serbs didn't give the US access before, but now the US can get through Croatia and Bosniac which is terrorised by Islam).
The international media blitz on the demonised Serbs allowed them to get viewers' consent to 'intervene' in Yugoslavia.
They armed and trained the Croatians and Albanians, both of whom had been part of the Nazi side during WWII.
Several news sources (not AAP or Reuters) regularly wrote about how the CIA set up fronts in Eastern-Europe. Many Eastern-European demonstrations against pro-Russian governments that one sees on the news (Ukraine, Georgia, now Belarus) turn out to be manufactured. The pro-European government that is elected is often due to an entirely rigged election, as many Eastern-Europeans have complained (see anti-war). Even the heads of the elected pro-European governments (I think this was in Georgia?) said that they did nothing to get elected and that the US had intervened to make them win. So they felt there should be a re-election.
Now the funny thing is that in Belarus, the recent election worked out correctly with a pro-Russian government winning legally. Then, not long after, the tv news shows how "protesters" are saying this legitimate election was rigged and want a re-election.