Blast In Mumbai's Suburban Train

[Guest]

Yes I know all about the break up of Yugoslavia. But look at the history of that country, it was put to gather by the victors of WWI, that too after so much ethnic conflict going back to 19th century and before. Under the Nazis the Croatians took active part in the genocide of the Serbs. Then it came under Tito, who kept this country together through his autocratic rule. And following the death of Tito, the old divisions flared up again. This event coincided with the reunification of Germany, which was the first one along with other Europeans to recognize the secession of Slovenia, and Croatia. The presence of distinct autonomous republics with genocidal ethnic hatred, and religious one on top of that is not to be found in India.
The conflict in India will take the form of a civil war, not a clear cut secession. Another factor that was present in Yugoslavia was that Serbia was the only constituent which was interested in keeping the country together. But a war against a common Islamic enemy will be a uniting factor for the majority across different regions. Nor is India dependent on a foreign power, like Serbia was, to take care of its defence. So, the scope of intervention is much less.

I also know about the Orange Revolution in Ukraine, the Rose Revolution in Georgia, and the Tulip Revolution in Krygystan, as well as, the move to oust Lukashenko in Belarus. That is the geopolitical game being played to checkmate Russia and oust the former communist bosses.

How is that relevant to the situation in India? If the government does not have the means to stop civil strife, what would the West do, bring in the other coalition through revolution?