Opening post probably meant 'executions of terrorists' (Islamic, communist, NE militants) - I agree with that. But the terrorists need to be captured first. And we do need a powerful government to get that done.
But no Hindu party is ever going to become undemocratic, the only ones that will (as Mudy pointed out in post 4) are already in power: the Christo-communist alliance we currently have. They are also maintaining their power by lying about 'hindu fundamentalism', making ignorant Hindus think that a 'hindu fundamentalist' government might take away the pluralistic character of India. Thus the average Hindu votes the way of Congress, playing right into their hands.
We definitely need proper, representative governance, not one that uses sly tactics to get itself elected instead of what would have been the natural victor. We need a Hindu party that will undo the p-sec mantra that 'secularism' means protection of minorities. Secularism doesn't mean that - it means equal treatment of all (non-terrorist) religious and non-religious groups in the eyes of the law. No more minority favouritism at the cost of the majority whilst undermining majority rights.
If all works fairly, I don't think we even need a coup to get a Hindu party elected. What we need is people to open their eyes to the abyss that our current government is dragging us into. Tell all Hindus you know what the situation is under Congress rule which appeases ChristoIslamics and communists; and then tell them to pass on the word.
A coup is only necessary if the Congress with its helpers in India's Christo-Islamist power circles and the Indology depts used illegitimate methods to stay in power. Say by framing Godhra and now the Mumbai incidents on 'Hindu fundamentalists' for what is in reality the handiwork of India's own Jihadist Ummah; and thus getting the popular vote of even the average Hindu. (Consider the communist success in Nepal.) In that case a Hindu leader, with a constructive vision and no tolerance for intolerance, is most welcome to stay in power beyond the required period for a democracy.
But no Hindu party is ever going to become undemocratic, the only ones that will (as Mudy pointed out in post 4) are already in power: the Christo-communist alliance we currently have. They are also maintaining their power by lying about 'hindu fundamentalism', making ignorant Hindus think that a 'hindu fundamentalist' government might take away the pluralistic character of India. Thus the average Hindu votes the way of Congress, playing right into their hands.
We definitely need proper, representative governance, not one that uses sly tactics to get itself elected instead of what would have been the natural victor. We need a Hindu party that will undo the p-sec mantra that 'secularism' means protection of minorities. Secularism doesn't mean that - it means equal treatment of all (non-terrorist) religious and non-religious groups in the eyes of the law. No more minority favouritism at the cost of the majority whilst undermining majority rights.
If all works fairly, I don't think we even need a coup to get a Hindu party elected. What we need is people to open their eyes to the abyss that our current government is dragging us into. Tell all Hindus you know what the situation is under Congress rule which appeases ChristoIslamics and communists; and then tell them to pass on the word.
A coup is only necessary if the Congress with its helpers in India's Christo-Islamist power circles and the Indology depts used illegitimate methods to stay in power. Say by framing Godhra and now the Mumbai incidents on 'Hindu fundamentalists' for what is in reality the handiwork of India's own Jihadist Ummah; and thus getting the popular vote of even the average Hindu. (Consider the communist success in Nepal.) In that case a Hindu leader, with a constructive vision and no tolerance for intolerance, is most welcome to stay in power beyond the required period for a democracy.