07-21-2006, 04:38 PM
Before the nature of the rule and law, shouldn't one mull over the nature of people, their shared vision, and the purpose? <b>The only purpose </b>seems to be appeasement (all around), tolerating the intolerant and taking pride in being a domesticated "pet" of <b>other powers </b>(and powers to be) - military, religious, political etc, except for the "people of bharatam".
Perhaps, a better question: Does India deserve freedom and independence? It is working for very few, but majority seems to have no clue. Freedom/Independence concepts and ensuing purpose, 60 yrs ago, seemed valid and workable, but does it still hold valid? Or those concepts completely gone?
If not, why do we deserve freedom and independence and for what purpose? Then we can see the nature of the rule...
If the only purpose is as stated above, does not matter what the heck it is that is lording over us.
Perhaps, a better question: Does India deserve freedom and independence? It is working for very few, but majority seems to have no clue. Freedom/Independence concepts and ensuing purpose, 60 yrs ago, seemed valid and workable, but does it still hold valid? Or those concepts completely gone?
If not, why do we deserve freedom and independence and for what purpose? Then we can see the nature of the rule...
If the only purpose is as stated above, does not matter what the heck it is that is lording over us.