07-21-2006, 10:09 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Husky+Jul 20 2006, 07:28 PM-->QUOTE(Husky @ Jul 20 2006, 07:28 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Post 10 (Vijayk):
Your suggestions are very good to ensure proper governance in a democracy and could work well if implemented within an India devoid of certain other difficulties.
Communism does not seek democratic government (it is a fundamentally undemocratic ideology like Islam and Christianity, that similarly merely pretends democracy until it can ensure more for itself). Therefore, even though our communist-backed Congress appears to be elected democratically, I suspect that they have been cheating to get themselves elected through propaganda diffused via the media and through leverage from other countries.
Even when the BJP was in power last, all the Congress and its communist and p-sec machinery did was try and throw a negative light and fundamentalist spin on everything the legitimate government was doing. They kept important facts hidden (temple evidence at Ayodhya for example) and manufactured 'facts' to suit their agenda.
For your suggestions to work properly, we should ideally start with a situation where we do not have the other three problems (that we are currently facing) interfering with our elections or the government once elected. They make the situation in India far trickier and messier than merely having to deal with corrupt governance in India.
For instance, the pro-minority-only government we have today certainly wouldn't want a judicial system that would rule against their minority-appeasement. Nor would they want a law enforcement that would actually act on intelligence and prevent or contain terrorist acts. This would defeat their purpose. Therefore, your ideas for keeping the three aspects of a democracy separated would be the last ones they would want implemented. Communism (or the current communist-backed p-sec government) doesn't want 3 separately functioning legal bodies that keep each other in check - no, they'd ideally like one, and if they can't have one, they'll have to pretend they have 3 but make them function in unison and in accord with them as they do now.
[right][snapback]54179[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Thanks.
The first and foremost is to cut the power brokers such as SONIA/MULYAM/LALOO/Advani. It also empowers good people to go and fight out without any allegiance to these crap leaders but dedicated to a cause. If they don't deliver, they are history. Sometimes, it pains me to see good people lose because there is SWEEP against his/her party. Imagine, you may not like COMMIES but like your MP/MLA. You can vote for him as long as the PM/CM is not a COMMIE. The parliamentary system does not provide that facility. You are not electing executive and legislature seperately.
Your suggestions are very good to ensure proper governance in a democracy and could work well if implemented within an India devoid of certain other difficulties.
Communism does not seek democratic government (it is a fundamentally undemocratic ideology like Islam and Christianity, that similarly merely pretends democracy until it can ensure more for itself). Therefore, even though our communist-backed Congress appears to be elected democratically, I suspect that they have been cheating to get themselves elected through propaganda diffused via the media and through leverage from other countries.
Even when the BJP was in power last, all the Congress and its communist and p-sec machinery did was try and throw a negative light and fundamentalist spin on everything the legitimate government was doing. They kept important facts hidden (temple evidence at Ayodhya for example) and manufactured 'facts' to suit their agenda.
For your suggestions to work properly, we should ideally start with a situation where we do not have the other three problems (that we are currently facing) interfering with our elections or the government once elected. They make the situation in India far trickier and messier than merely having to deal with corrupt governance in India.
For instance, the pro-minority-only government we have today certainly wouldn't want a judicial system that would rule against their minority-appeasement. Nor would they want a law enforcement that would actually act on intelligence and prevent or contain terrorist acts. This would defeat their purpose. Therefore, your ideas for keeping the three aspects of a democracy separated would be the last ones they would want implemented. Communism (or the current communist-backed p-sec government) doesn't want 3 separately functioning legal bodies that keep each other in check - no, they'd ideally like one, and if they can't have one, they'll have to pretend they have 3 but make them function in unison and in accord with them as they do now.
[right][snapback]54179[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Thanks.
The first and foremost is to cut the power brokers such as SONIA/MULYAM/LALOO/Advani. It also empowers good people to go and fight out without any allegiance to these crap leaders but dedicated to a cause. If they don't deliver, they are history. Sometimes, it pains me to see good people lose because there is SWEEP against his/her party. Imagine, you may not like COMMIES but like your MP/MLA. You can vote for him as long as the PM/CM is not a COMMIE. The parliamentary system does not provide that facility. You are not electing executive and legislature seperately.