07-27-2006, 08:09 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-ben_ami+Jul 27 2006, 12:51 AM-->QUOTE(ben_ami @ Jul 27 2006, 12:51 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->but the AIT or its alternative has to explain a lot of things, linguistic or otherwise.
[right][snapback]54668[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I agree with ben_ami. AIT consists of multi-disciplinary assault - archeological, literary, hydro-archeorlogic, anthropic, and we like it or not - philological and linguistic. In order to totally blast AIT, we need to do two things:
- Blast AIT on all disciplines. Don't just target one or few dimensions of it, but all. Including linguistics.
- Provide a viable alternative theory, which would answer ALL questions. Including language links. If a succesful alternative theory can answer convincingly, AIT will automatically disappear. It is like this - we can not fight darkness. All we have to do it bring light, and darkness disappears.
[right][snapback]54668[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I agree with ben_ami. AIT consists of multi-disciplinary assault - archeological, literary, hydro-archeorlogic, anthropic, and we like it or not - philological and linguistic. In order to totally blast AIT, we need to do two things:
- Blast AIT on all disciplines. Don't just target one or few dimensions of it, but all. Including linguistics.
- Provide a viable alternative theory, which would answer ALL questions. Including language links. If a succesful alternative theory can answer convincingly, AIT will automatically disappear. It is like this - we can not fight darkness. All we have to do it bring light, and darkness disappears.