08-03-2006, 12:43 PM
This is what we call standard Indian History narrations.
Chohans never took Delhi in a bloody conflict.Infact if we had these chouhans in delhi than how come Anangpal tomar might have ruled Delhi when Someswar the father of Pthiviraj was ruling in Ajmer as his vassal .
As per standard version of Indian History some five chohan kings ruled delhi between 1162 to Anangpal in rotate the chair game each ruling for five or four years till prthviraj was given kingdom by tomar king anangpal (recorded even by chanderbardayi)reported jat in local historical records.
Doesn't it sound amusing.
I am still to come across a sound evidence that lead indian historian to think that chohans got delhi in in 1162 AD.
Chohans never took Delhi in a bloody conflict.Infact if we had these chouhans in delhi than how come Anangpal tomar might have ruled Delhi when Someswar the father of Pthiviraj was ruling in Ajmer as his vassal .
As per standard version of Indian History some five chohan kings ruled delhi between 1162 to Anangpal in rotate the chair game each ruling for five or four years till prthviraj was given kingdom by tomar king anangpal (recorded even by chanderbardayi)reported jat in local historical records.
Doesn't it sound amusing.
I am still to come across a sound evidence that lead indian historian to think that chohans got delhi in in 1162 AD.