08-16-2006, 01:42 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>CA Textbook Battle Update:Judge Allows CAPEEM'S Lawsuit </b>
[SUMMARY: CA State Board of Education wanted the Federal courts to dismiss the CAPEEM lawsuit, and the 9th circuit Federal court in San Francisco judge has ruled against them in his written communication to te two parties].
For Immediate Release
<b>JUDGE ALLOWS CAPEEMâS TEXTBOOK LAWSUIT TO GO FORWARD</b>
Los Angeles, August 11, 2006
California Parents for the Equalization of Educational Materials (CAPEEM) scored a victory on Friday when United States District Court Judge, Frank C. Damrell, Jr. ruled that CAPEEM's lawsuit on the textbook adoption process can proceed.
Judge Damrell rejected the defendants' arguments that CAPEEM lacked standing to bring the lawsuit. The Court ruled that CAPEEM had sufficiently alleged that "[the] parent members of CAPEEM and their children would suffer an injury in fact that is concrete, particularized and imminent."
In addition to challenging CAPEEM's standing, the defendants attacked the substance of CAPEEM's Equal Protection Clause claims.
The Court rejected these arguments, ruling that allegations of "repeated scrutiny of proposed edits; secretive processes in making final decisions; and, hostile academic advisors . . . if true, could establish grounds for relief under an Equal Protection claim."
Finally, Judge Damrell ruled that the claims of the CDE/SBE members "acting in their official capacities [are] not barred by the Eleventh Amendment".
Reacting to the judgment Rajesh Goswami, a director of CAPEEM, said, âJudge Damrell's ruling recognizes the gravity of harm resulting from an unequal process as applied to minority religious and ethnic groups and the harm from educational materials which denigrate those groups. CAPEEM is extremely enthusiastic about the courtâs ruling that its lawsuit can proceed.â
Venkat Balasubramani, CAPEEM's lawyer, likewise expressed satisfaction with the ruling.
Donations:
Your donation is going to be tax-exempt. CAPEEM is in the process of getting
the non-profit status. It may take several months before we get the official
approval. If you are concerned about it please donate to HICAD (Hindu
International Council against Defamation), who is going to give the funds to
CAPEEM. HICAD Tax-ID: 22-3810334.
You can send a check directly to CAPEEM (payable to CAPEEM).
P.O.Box 280442, Northridge, CA 91328
You can send a check to HICAD (Payable to HICAD, in the memo write: âCAPEEMâ
or âCalifornia parentsâ). HICAD address: 22 Jackie Drive   Â
Morganville, NJ 07751
www.capeem.org/index_files/Page451.htm <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
[SUMMARY: CA State Board of Education wanted the Federal courts to dismiss the CAPEEM lawsuit, and the 9th circuit Federal court in San Francisco judge has ruled against them in his written communication to te two parties].
For Immediate Release
<b>JUDGE ALLOWS CAPEEMâS TEXTBOOK LAWSUIT TO GO FORWARD</b>
Los Angeles, August 11, 2006
California Parents for the Equalization of Educational Materials (CAPEEM) scored a victory on Friday when United States District Court Judge, Frank C. Damrell, Jr. ruled that CAPEEM's lawsuit on the textbook adoption process can proceed.
Judge Damrell rejected the defendants' arguments that CAPEEM lacked standing to bring the lawsuit. The Court ruled that CAPEEM had sufficiently alleged that "[the] parent members of CAPEEM and their children would suffer an injury in fact that is concrete, particularized and imminent."
In addition to challenging CAPEEM's standing, the defendants attacked the substance of CAPEEM's Equal Protection Clause claims.
The Court rejected these arguments, ruling that allegations of "repeated scrutiny of proposed edits; secretive processes in making final decisions; and, hostile academic advisors . . . if true, could establish grounds for relief under an Equal Protection claim."
Finally, Judge Damrell ruled that the claims of the CDE/SBE members "acting in their official capacities [are] not barred by the Eleventh Amendment".
Reacting to the judgment Rajesh Goswami, a director of CAPEEM, said, âJudge Damrell's ruling recognizes the gravity of harm resulting from an unequal process as applied to minority religious and ethnic groups and the harm from educational materials which denigrate those groups. CAPEEM is extremely enthusiastic about the courtâs ruling that its lawsuit can proceed.â
Venkat Balasubramani, CAPEEM's lawyer, likewise expressed satisfaction with the ruling.
Donations:
Your donation is going to be tax-exempt. CAPEEM is in the process of getting
the non-profit status. It may take several months before we get the official
approval. If you are concerned about it please donate to HICAD (Hindu
International Council against Defamation), who is going to give the funds to
CAPEEM. HICAD Tax-ID: 22-3810334.
You can send a check directly to CAPEEM (payable to CAPEEM).
P.O.Box 280442, Northridge, CA 91328
You can send a check to HICAD (Payable to HICAD, in the memo write: âCAPEEMâ
or âCalifornia parentsâ). HICAD address: 22 Jackie Drive   Â
Morganville, NJ 07751
www.capeem.org/index_files/Page451.htm <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->