<span style='font-size:13pt;line-height:100%'><b>Need good writing skills, and historical expertise.</b></span>
Below is a site on Wikipedia on Islamic 'invasion' of India which seems to be overrun by Islamic zealots as it reeks of lies seems to justify the killing of hundreds of millions of Hindus by Islamic terrorists in the past 1300 years.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_invasion_of_india
The discussion page mentions that one Raghu Kuttan tried to modify the page but it was removed by the muslims. Unfortunately, books by BharatVani and other books that paint a true picture are thrown out by Indian Government itself and hence serves as a weak reference.
Can someone with good writing skills and someone who can systematically - with reference - add to the argument ?
excerpt:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Vijayanagara
The city flourished between the 14th century and 16th century, during the height of the Vijayanagar Empire. During this time, it was often in conflict with the kingdoms which rose in the Northern Deccan, and which are often collectively termed the Deccan Sultanates. The period saw brutalities from both sides. <b>In 1366, Bukka I captured the Muslim region of Mudkal and slaughtered all but one inhabitant. The lone survivor of this carnage is supposed to have taken the news to Mohammad Shah, the Sultan of the Bahamani sultanate. In response the sultan ravaged the hindus</b> (Reference: Lonely Planet INDIA, 2005). In 1565, the empire's armies suffered a massive and catastrophic defeat at by an alliance of the Sultanates, and the capital was taken. The victorious armies then razed, depopulated and destroyed the city over several months. The empire continued in slow decline, but the original capital was not reoccupied or rebuilt.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Below is a site on Wikipedia on Islamic 'invasion' of India which seems to be overrun by Islamic zealots as it reeks of lies seems to justify the killing of hundreds of millions of Hindus by Islamic terrorists in the past 1300 years.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_invasion_of_india
The discussion page mentions that one Raghu Kuttan tried to modify the page but it was removed by the muslims. Unfortunately, books by BharatVani and other books that paint a true picture are thrown out by Indian Government itself and hence serves as a weak reference.
Can someone with good writing skills and someone who can systematically - with reference - add to the argument ?
excerpt:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Vijayanagara
The city flourished between the 14th century and 16th century, during the height of the Vijayanagar Empire. During this time, it was often in conflict with the kingdoms which rose in the Northern Deccan, and which are often collectively termed the Deccan Sultanates. The period saw brutalities from both sides. <b>In 1366, Bukka I captured the Muslim region of Mudkal and slaughtered all but one inhabitant. The lone survivor of this carnage is supposed to have taken the news to Mohammad Shah, the Sultan of the Bahamani sultanate. In response the sultan ravaged the hindus</b> (Reference: Lonely Planet INDIA, 2005). In 1565, the empire's armies suffered a massive and catastrophic defeat at by an alliance of the Sultanates, and the capital was taken. The victorious armies then razed, depopulated and destroyed the city over several months. The empire continued in slow decline, but the original capital was not reoccupied or rebuilt.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->