08-24-2006, 07:43 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-Ravi Chaudhary+Aug 24 2006, 02:21 AM-->QUOTE(Ravi Chaudhary @ Aug 24 2006, 02:21 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->
This assistance could not have been given without the support and advice of their Hindu priestly mantris, which is a subject all run away from.
The house of Mewar is the only one that stood out like a beacon, and paid the price.Â
[ Today their descendants may deny it, but they too did not call themselves Rajputs until the 16th century. They knew themselves as Jats. (Humayunâs memoirs)]
[edited - admin
provide reference to historical books , not to your yahoo group and messages]
[right][snapback]56128[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Ravi,
Let us take things one by one:
Baburnama, which preceedes Humayun, states Sanga was a rajput and also mentions Maharawal of Udaipur as a rajput. So you are plain wrong.
-Digvijay
This assistance could not have been given without the support and advice of their Hindu priestly mantris, which is a subject all run away from.
The house of Mewar is the only one that stood out like a beacon, and paid the price.Â
[ Today their descendants may deny it, but they too did not call themselves Rajputs until the 16th century. They knew themselves as Jats. (Humayunâs memoirs)]
[edited - admin
provide reference to historical books , not to your yahoo group and messages]
[right][snapback]56128[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Ravi,
Let us take things one by one:
Baburnama, which preceedes Humayun, states Sanga was a rajput and also mentions Maharawal of Udaipur as a rajput. So you are plain wrong.
-Digvijay