08-27-2006, 10:19 AM
Quote..Gullaria.
The word Rajput has evolved from Rajaputra, which was there not only before 10th Century, but in fact going right back to the Vedic texts....a long time before the word Jat comes into the picture.
Really...?...?
Than show me just one single evidence that it was not the title as maharajadhraj sheansah or khastrpa but cast of any ruler just one single evidence.
Since you know the history of katoch gullaria rajputs or rajputras from first AD than you must have seen the use of rajputra for your ancesstor kindly show me one single reference where they were called so, it is so easy for you.
Again what do you say of IBBETSON and Rose who witnessed these live rajputisation process where different cast adopted rajput titles.Any genuine answer?
Since as per your claim the rajputra was used for vedic rajput than show me just use of this word in vedic texts.
As vedic texts are not aware of rajput word or cast than what could have been the identity of todays rajputs if youy claim them from vedic period.Have you any evidence that rajputra was used for a group of people like Temur noted these demon like Jats or the companion of prophet used these people looked like Hind jats in physique ETC.. ETC..
Now don't claim that some other word like rajanya might have been used for this cast in vedic times.When we are discussing we have to show some factual evidences not guesses and imagination that it might have been like this like that.Again rajanya a plural of rajan used for king is a very beautiful word .If you further stretch imagination that it was used for rajput cast than why such a beautiful name was dropped for a word like rajput lateron ,why any reason...?
If you just see the groups parthians phalavs called them jats arabian called them jats persian called them jats albrunie called them jats herodotus called them jats written jatae etc..a real history not like some built up identity which changes ever season of history with no evidence to relate to present cast.
Gullaria ji pls be honest in just one simple answer.
Do you believe that Huna rajput of today were called Huna rajanya in vedic period.
Let us be honest in our ancesstory as denying that is equal to disrespecting our ancesstors.
PS Gullaria ji what you belive that gullarias would never have moved from himachal ,when rajputs from rajasthan can go to Nepal why can't they go to himachal .You know the immigration laws were very liberal those days
The word Rajput has evolved from Rajaputra, which was there not only before 10th Century, but in fact going right back to the Vedic texts....a long time before the word Jat comes into the picture.
Really...?...?
Than show me just one single evidence that it was not the title as maharajadhraj sheansah or khastrpa but cast of any ruler just one single evidence.
Since you know the history of katoch gullaria rajputs or rajputras from first AD than you must have seen the use of rajputra for your ancesstor kindly show me one single reference where they were called so, it is so easy for you.
Again what do you say of IBBETSON and Rose who witnessed these live rajputisation process where different cast adopted rajput titles.Any genuine answer?
Since as per your claim the rajputra was used for vedic rajput than show me just use of this word in vedic texts.
As vedic texts are not aware of rajput word or cast than what could have been the identity of todays rajputs if youy claim them from vedic period.Have you any evidence that rajputra was used for a group of people like Temur noted these demon like Jats or the companion of prophet used these people looked like Hind jats in physique ETC.. ETC..
Now don't claim that some other word like rajanya might have been used for this cast in vedic times.When we are discussing we have to show some factual evidences not guesses and imagination that it might have been like this like that.Again rajanya a plural of rajan used for king is a very beautiful word .If you further stretch imagination that it was used for rajput cast than why such a beautiful name was dropped for a word like rajput lateron ,why any reason...?
If you just see the groups parthians phalavs called them jats arabian called them jats persian called them jats albrunie called them jats herodotus called them jats written jatae etc..a real history not like some built up identity which changes ever season of history with no evidence to relate to present cast.
Gullaria ji pls be honest in just one simple answer.
Do you believe that Huna rajput of today were called Huna rajanya in vedic period.
Let us be honest in our ancesstory as denying that is equal to disrespecting our ancesstors.
PS Gullaria ji what you belive that gullarias would never have moved from himachal ,when rajputs from rajasthan can go to Nepal why can't they go to himachal .You know the immigration laws were very liberal those days