Jat History

[Guest]

Ravi,
Nandibum cannot answer basic questions. So let us ask you (You might want to scroll up to see nandi's response so that you do not repeat what he said, which was practically nothing):

a) Why is that rajputs and Jats are socially so different? If they were same people
they should be socially same. Rajput women do not go and work in the fields
while Jat women do. (Do not give me one off examples. We are taking about
what generally happens in Jat and rajput villages).

b) Why is that rajputs and Jats do not intermarry?

c) Why is it that the ancient Hara, Khichi clan of chauhan rajputs absent in Jats?
(Hooda is not acceptable as Hara because if rajputs can retain Hara/Khichi so
should have Jats if they were same). Hara rajputs ruled Boondi and Kotah.
Prithviraj Chauhan belonged to the Khichi Shakha of Chauhans.
http://www.uq.net.au/~zzhsoszy/ips/misc/chauhan.html

d) Why is it that both jats and gujjars claiming the exact same things:
Gujjar claim:
a) Maharana Pratap was a gujjar

Jat claim:
b) Maharana Pratap was a Jat


-Digvijay