Jat History

[Guest]

<!--QuoteBegin-Ravi Chaudhary+Aug 31 2006, 12:12 AM-->QUOTE(Ravi Chaudhary @ Aug 31 2006, 12:12 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteBegin-Capt Manmohan Kumar+Aug 30 2006, 10:52 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Capt Manmohan Kumar @ Aug 30 2006, 10:52 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->


Captain Kumar

Thank you for your contribution, and attempts to mollify people.

This is not about mollification or ‘tu tu men men’

It is about using fabricated evidence to paint a false picture of History.

..............

[right][snapback]56501[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Ravi,

False picture of history is being peddled by you and other like minded JATS who call Maharana Sanga and Pratap a Jat. Chittaur is Jittaur in your dreams and you have bunch of school kids perhaps on your website that you can preach to.

Any Hindu and ANY SENSIBLE JAT would not accept your non-sense that Mewar Rajputs are Jats. This is what I call delusion and the sooner you grow out of it the better it would be for you.

Strangely it is not just a section of Jats who are suffering from inferiority complex, there is section of Gujjars also! Both Jats and Gujjars have identical claims: Mewar was jat/gujjar, Pratap was Jat/Gujjar, Prithviraj was Jat/gujjar.....(a long list of stupid claims).........

I wonder what is the source of this complex?



-Digvijay