10-12-2006, 01:12 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->At UB, Sreenivasan teaches a graduate seminar on "Religion and State in South Asia, 1200 to 1800" and an undergraduate course on "Islam and Muslims in Modern South Asia."
She offers several reasons for the growing interest in such courses at universities across the United States.
First, a migration to the United States of professional, middle-class South Asians in the 1960s and 1970s contributed to the growth of South Asian course offerings on American campuses, Sreenivasan says, because now the children of those immigrants are attending college and want to learn about their heritage. She notes that in addition to courses offered through the history department, UB also offers instruction in Arabic, Hindi and Sanskrit.
Several other factors have contributed to the growth of interest in South Asian history in the U.S., Sreenivasan says. One is the United States' interest in developing or sustaining long-term relationships with countries like Pakistan and India. Another is that nationally, she says, there is some government support for expanding South Asian course offeringsâin the same way Chinese history expanded dramatically in the United States in the 1960s and 1970s.
Sreenivasan says tensions between religious communities in South Asia have increased dramatically in the past 20 years. Why? "It's the million-dollar question for social science," she says. "There is an immediate political imperative to try and understand what's happening so we can combat it."
Sreenivasan is engaged in groundbreaking research with a group of scholars from the University of Arizona, Rutgers and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign who are working on a collaborative history of slavery in South Asiaâshedding new light on a long-shrouded topic.
Her own research for this project centers on a group of women and children who served as domestics in the elite Rajput society in India between the 17th and 19th centuries.
Sreenivasan says history always has enriched itself by documenting that which has been left out. "If we are striving to move toward equality of access, then I think it is important to recover earlier histories of oppression, to document how the inequality of access was established," she says.
Sreenivasan's area of special interest is historical memory-the ways in which particular communities in South Asia remember their pasts, dating from the 16th to 20th centuries. She looks at a community's understanding of history in both literary and historical accounts, and then traces how the memory of some of these communities ends up being incorporated as a nation's history, while the history of other communities becomes marginalized.
She currently is researching the Rajput, an elite, military, aristocratic society in northern India. This particular community of proto-nationalists resisted being integrated in empires. Tourists who visit India typically are herded through the Rajput's old fortresses and palaces, which are now archaeological sites.
"My undergraduates come in with the notion that colonialism is evil and oppressive," says Sreenivasan. "Of course, it is morally wrong, but there are more interesting questions to be asked: Why did it succeed? Clearly, it had to have some local allies. Who gained and who lost ground?"<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Interest in "South Asian" history
She offers several reasons for the growing interest in such courses at universities across the United States.
First, a migration to the United States of professional, middle-class South Asians in the 1960s and 1970s contributed to the growth of South Asian course offerings on American campuses, Sreenivasan says, because now the children of those immigrants are attending college and want to learn about their heritage. She notes that in addition to courses offered through the history department, UB also offers instruction in Arabic, Hindi and Sanskrit.
Several other factors have contributed to the growth of interest in South Asian history in the U.S., Sreenivasan says. One is the United States' interest in developing or sustaining long-term relationships with countries like Pakistan and India. Another is that nationally, she says, there is some government support for expanding South Asian course offeringsâin the same way Chinese history expanded dramatically in the United States in the 1960s and 1970s.
Sreenivasan says tensions between religious communities in South Asia have increased dramatically in the past 20 years. Why? "It's the million-dollar question for social science," she says. "There is an immediate political imperative to try and understand what's happening so we can combat it."
Sreenivasan is engaged in groundbreaking research with a group of scholars from the University of Arizona, Rutgers and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign who are working on a collaborative history of slavery in South Asiaâshedding new light on a long-shrouded topic.
Her own research for this project centers on a group of women and children who served as domestics in the elite Rajput society in India between the 17th and 19th centuries.
Sreenivasan says history always has enriched itself by documenting that which has been left out. "If we are striving to move toward equality of access, then I think it is important to recover earlier histories of oppression, to document how the inequality of access was established," she says.
Sreenivasan's area of special interest is historical memory-the ways in which particular communities in South Asia remember their pasts, dating from the 16th to 20th centuries. She looks at a community's understanding of history in both literary and historical accounts, and then traces how the memory of some of these communities ends up being incorporated as a nation's history, while the history of other communities becomes marginalized.
She currently is researching the Rajput, an elite, military, aristocratic society in northern India. This particular community of proto-nationalists resisted being integrated in empires. Tourists who visit India typically are herded through the Rajput's old fortresses and palaces, which are now archaeological sites.
"My undergraduates come in with the notion that colonialism is evil and oppressive," says Sreenivasan. "Of course, it is morally wrong, but there are more interesting questions to be asked: Why did it succeed? Clearly, it had to have some local allies. Who gained and who lost ground?"<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Interest in "South Asian" history