<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->surinder wrote:
http://www.arabnews.com/?page=9§ion=0&...&d=9&m=9&y=2006
<b>
Now Dr. Israr finds a disturbing portent for the future of Pakistan. âI am worried. <span style='font-size:21pt;line-height:100%'><span style='color:red'>The reasons why Pakistan was created (âwajh-e-jawaazâ), its raison dâetre, are being questioned now. This worries me. âWhy Pakistan?â the younger generation keeps asking. It is becoming a chorus now. âWhy did you go for partition?â they ask. âWhat was the reason?â Is that not a worrying factor?â</span>
Dr. Israr elaborated. âThere were two reasons (for the creation of Pakistan) â one positive and one negative. The negative factor was the fear of the Hindu: the Hindu will finish us off; the Hindu will suppress us (âHindu hum ko dabayega,â âHindu hum ko kha jayegaâ... etc., etc.) The Hindu will take revenge. It will finish our culture. It will strangle our language. This was the negative issue that became a rallying cry for the Muslim League. Remember, at this stage the Muslim League was not a party. It was just a club of nawabs and jagirdars. In his address of 1930 in Allahabad (âKhutba-e-Allahabadâ), the legendary poet Iqbal gave an ideological injection to this movement. During the address, Iqbal said: âIt is my conviction that in the north of India an independent Muslim state will be established.â It was a prophesy â not a proposal. Iqbal went on to say: âIf this happens, we will be able to project the true picture of Islam to the world.â This was the positive reason.
When Dr. Israr thinks back to the creation of Pakistan, he marvels over the consensus that formed it. âIt was a miracle. Can there be any bigger stupidity from the political standpoint as to why a UP Muslim should support the Muslim League? It was an emotional atmosphere. Bombay Muslim, Madrasi Muslim, CP (Central Provinces) Muslim â what did they have to do with Pakistan? But they were the real creators of Pakistan. In Punjab, there was never a Muslim League ministry even for one day. It was either in East Pakistan or Sindh. Until the end, it was the Congress ministry in the North West Frontier Province (NWFP). The real creators of Pakistan then were the Muslims of the minority provinces. They generated a wave in 1946. It was because of this wave that when the elections took place, they established beyond a shadow of doubt that the Muslim League was the sole representative party of the Muslim community.â
Dr. Israr said that what started right, soon went wrong. âThe creation of Pakistan was a good thing. It was created with good intentions; there was a long historical background to the movement, but we failed badly. There is one quote from Quaid-e-Azam worth remembering: âGod has given us a golden opportunity to prove our worth as architects of a new state, and let it not be said that we didnât prove equal to the task.â Unfortunately, we proved that we were not equal to the task. Where is Pakistan? We divided it into two countries (in 1971). What do we have now? There is no such thing as âqaumâ in Pakistan.
âOnly a miracle can save Pakistan,â Dr. Israr said. âTo me, the creation of Pakistan was in itself a miracle, and I see optimism only in the form of a miracle. In 1946, Quaid-e-Azam had given up on the demand for Pakistan. When you had accepted the Cabinet Mission Plan, what did it mean? It meant that the country would remain united for 10 years. There were to be three zones. Yes, after 10 years any zone would have had the option of secession. All this meant that for 10 long years, there was no question of an independent country. It was only after Nehru issued a statement saying âWho lets anybody separate after 10 years?â that is when Quaid-e-Azam got adamant. He took a step back. âAgar yahi niyat hai to ye Cabinet mission plan hamen manzoor nahi haiâ (If these are what your intentions are, then we donât accept this Cabinet Mission Plan). It was Nehru who created Pakistan.
</b></span>
It was Nehru who created Pakistan. (A common Paki refrain. I think this type of statement needs Piskological focus. It seems strange that a Pakis would credit their hated adversary for creating their beloved country. There is a deep down feeling among Pakis that Pakistan was merely a mistake, and Nehru, and all the other Hindus, should be blamed for it. It seems like that girl in the movie Excorcist when she is shouts "Help me.")
There is a funda behind this.
Jinnah and Muslim League ML were working on a escalation ladder with Nehru and congress with the demand for Pakistan. What was the final goal. The goal was to get a large electrorate dominance in the united India Parliament for Muslims in India. The idea was that Nehru and congress would back down in that confrontation and accept a larger influence of Muslims in the legislature of a united India.
But Nehru and Patel made a larger decision based on British influence with the ML and future potential for breakup and chaos in a united India. They also believed that Jinnah would back down later and then ask for merger with India since Indus water and kashmir was still to be resolved. They believed that Pakistan would cease to be proxy for the master after a period of realization. But master used UN and other tricks to keep the game going for 60 years.
This uncertainity of Pakistan is showing up in Israr Ahmed statement in this way.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
http://www.arabnews.com/?page=9§ion=0&...&d=9&m=9&y=2006
<b>
Now Dr. Israr finds a disturbing portent for the future of Pakistan. âI am worried. <span style='font-size:21pt;line-height:100%'><span style='color:red'>The reasons why Pakistan was created (âwajh-e-jawaazâ), its raison dâetre, are being questioned now. This worries me. âWhy Pakistan?â the younger generation keeps asking. It is becoming a chorus now. âWhy did you go for partition?â they ask. âWhat was the reason?â Is that not a worrying factor?â</span>
Dr. Israr elaborated. âThere were two reasons (for the creation of Pakistan) â one positive and one negative. The negative factor was the fear of the Hindu: the Hindu will finish us off; the Hindu will suppress us (âHindu hum ko dabayega,â âHindu hum ko kha jayegaâ... etc., etc.) The Hindu will take revenge. It will finish our culture. It will strangle our language. This was the negative issue that became a rallying cry for the Muslim League. Remember, at this stage the Muslim League was not a party. It was just a club of nawabs and jagirdars. In his address of 1930 in Allahabad (âKhutba-e-Allahabadâ), the legendary poet Iqbal gave an ideological injection to this movement. During the address, Iqbal said: âIt is my conviction that in the north of India an independent Muslim state will be established.â It was a prophesy â not a proposal. Iqbal went on to say: âIf this happens, we will be able to project the true picture of Islam to the world.â This was the positive reason.
When Dr. Israr thinks back to the creation of Pakistan, he marvels over the consensus that formed it. âIt was a miracle. Can there be any bigger stupidity from the political standpoint as to why a UP Muslim should support the Muslim League? It was an emotional atmosphere. Bombay Muslim, Madrasi Muslim, CP (Central Provinces) Muslim â what did they have to do with Pakistan? But they were the real creators of Pakistan. In Punjab, there was never a Muslim League ministry even for one day. It was either in East Pakistan or Sindh. Until the end, it was the Congress ministry in the North West Frontier Province (NWFP). The real creators of Pakistan then were the Muslims of the minority provinces. They generated a wave in 1946. It was because of this wave that when the elections took place, they established beyond a shadow of doubt that the Muslim League was the sole representative party of the Muslim community.â
Dr. Israr said that what started right, soon went wrong. âThe creation of Pakistan was a good thing. It was created with good intentions; there was a long historical background to the movement, but we failed badly. There is one quote from Quaid-e-Azam worth remembering: âGod has given us a golden opportunity to prove our worth as architects of a new state, and let it not be said that we didnât prove equal to the task.â Unfortunately, we proved that we were not equal to the task. Where is Pakistan? We divided it into two countries (in 1971). What do we have now? There is no such thing as âqaumâ in Pakistan.
âOnly a miracle can save Pakistan,â Dr. Israr said. âTo me, the creation of Pakistan was in itself a miracle, and I see optimism only in the form of a miracle. In 1946, Quaid-e-Azam had given up on the demand for Pakistan. When you had accepted the Cabinet Mission Plan, what did it mean? It meant that the country would remain united for 10 years. There were to be three zones. Yes, after 10 years any zone would have had the option of secession. All this meant that for 10 long years, there was no question of an independent country. It was only after Nehru issued a statement saying âWho lets anybody separate after 10 years?â that is when Quaid-e-Azam got adamant. He took a step back. âAgar yahi niyat hai to ye Cabinet mission plan hamen manzoor nahi haiâ (If these are what your intentions are, then we donât accept this Cabinet Mission Plan). It was Nehru who created Pakistan.
</b></span>
It was Nehru who created Pakistan. (A common Paki refrain. I think this type of statement needs Piskological focus. It seems strange that a Pakis would credit their hated adversary for creating their beloved country. There is a deep down feeling among Pakis that Pakistan was merely a mistake, and Nehru, and all the other Hindus, should be blamed for it. It seems like that girl in the movie Excorcist when she is shouts "Help me.")
There is a funda behind this.
Jinnah and Muslim League ML were working on a escalation ladder with Nehru and congress with the demand for Pakistan. What was the final goal. The goal was to get a large electrorate dominance in the united India Parliament for Muslims in India. The idea was that Nehru and congress would back down in that confrontation and accept a larger influence of Muslims in the legislature of a united India.
But Nehru and Patel made a larger decision based on British influence with the ML and future potential for breakup and chaos in a united India. They also believed that Jinnah would back down later and then ask for merger with India since Indus water and kashmir was still to be resolved. They believed that Pakistan would cease to be proxy for the master after a period of realization. But master used UN and other tricks to keep the game going for 60 years.
This uncertainity of Pakistan is showing up in Israr Ahmed statement in this way.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->