<!--QuoteBegin-Viren+Jan 27 2007, 01:02 AM-->QUOTE(Viren @ Jan 27 2007, 01:02 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->The siege of grievance concoction<!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->But soon, a banker writing a loan cheque will have to take into account the borrowerâs religious practice. For, according to a report in The Economic Times, the government has asked the Indian Bankerâs Association to earmark a part of total loan disbursement for members of minority communities. On January 9, the banking division under the Finance Ministry told the IBA to set aside 15 per cent of priority sector lending in all categories for this segment. IBA in turn has asked member banks to furnish details of loans to minorities. This is the latest of the innovative communal initiative from the Manmohan Singh government.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
UPA directive will impact entire India - something even Emperor Aurangazeb could not do during his life time!!
[right][snapback]63587[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->I see Sonia Gandhi behind this, embarking on the eternal way of the Christian Church.
In Rome, with Constantine, many laws were enacted that made it advantageous to become a christian. Eventually the army was wholly christian. The same was repeated later in Asia in the 16th century: Vietnam, China, Thailand. In China, it turns out the empress even renamed herself Helena and baptised her son as Constantine. Sonia and her christian-only councillors have given the same hints in other ways.
In all cases, the christians who usurped power, or those in power who were converted to christianity by Jesuits, made sure that only christians could be in power, could be in the army. They also controlled education: only christians could become educated. And of course they would distribute money to christians and those willing to convert. Army personnel wanting to keep their jobs in Vietnam I think it was, started converting. Same happening in Korea starting from 2 decades ago.
Monetary benefits attached to being or becoming christian (basically inducements to convert) make it especially attractive for poorer people. And the expectations are that they will also work upwards to more well-off individuals.
What's happening in India now is merely a bribe at a national-level: the unethical, low means was formerly restricted to missionary terrorists who did it covertly (when there was no camera on) is now used by the 'Indian' government to do the same, openly.
All these monetary benefits will only last until majority is christoislamic, at which point the new laws will be scrapped (besides, it wouldn't make sense economically to start favouring very large masses of people).
But ultimately none of this worked on the full-scale in China, Thailand or Vietnam. Nor did it work in Rome: that's why Constantine's successors had to resort to butchering the Romans into conversion. Same as christianity had to do throughout history, including the rest of Europe.
Is there any way to internationall impeach Sonia Gandhi as a foreign and unnatural tyrant for her crimes against the indigenous character of our nation? To think our only real international contact with Italy had to be a villain, instead of the many other Italians. Rajeev sure knew to pick 'em. <!--emo&:angry:--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/mad.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='mad.gif' /><!--endemo-->
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
UPA directive will impact entire India - something even Emperor Aurangazeb could not do during his life time!!
[right][snapback]63587[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->I see Sonia Gandhi behind this, embarking on the eternal way of the Christian Church.
In Rome, with Constantine, many laws were enacted that made it advantageous to become a christian. Eventually the army was wholly christian. The same was repeated later in Asia in the 16th century: Vietnam, China, Thailand. In China, it turns out the empress even renamed herself Helena and baptised her son as Constantine. Sonia and her christian-only councillors have given the same hints in other ways.
In all cases, the christians who usurped power, or those in power who were converted to christianity by Jesuits, made sure that only christians could be in power, could be in the army. They also controlled education: only christians could become educated. And of course they would distribute money to christians and those willing to convert. Army personnel wanting to keep their jobs in Vietnam I think it was, started converting. Same happening in Korea starting from 2 decades ago.
Monetary benefits attached to being or becoming christian (basically inducements to convert) make it especially attractive for poorer people. And the expectations are that they will also work upwards to more well-off individuals.
What's happening in India now is merely a bribe at a national-level: the unethical, low means was formerly restricted to missionary terrorists who did it covertly (when there was no camera on) is now used by the 'Indian' government to do the same, openly.
All these monetary benefits will only last until majority is christoislamic, at which point the new laws will be scrapped (besides, it wouldn't make sense economically to start favouring very large masses of people).
But ultimately none of this worked on the full-scale in China, Thailand or Vietnam. Nor did it work in Rome: that's why Constantine's successors had to resort to butchering the Romans into conversion. Same as christianity had to do throughout history, including the rest of Europe.
Is there any way to internationall impeach Sonia Gandhi as a foreign and unnatural tyrant for her crimes against the indigenous character of our nation? To think our only real international contact with Italy had to be a villain, instead of the many other Italians. Rajeev sure knew to pick 'em. <!--emo&:angry:--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/mad.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='mad.gif' /><!--endemo-->