http://in.news.yahoo.com/070220/48/6cb5e.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Separatists worried at impact ahead of talks with Kasuri
By IE
Wednesday February 21, 02:12 AM
The attack on the Samjhauta Express has cast a cloud over the talks Pakistan Foreign Minister Khurshid Ahmed is scheduled to have with Kashmiri separatist leaders on February 22.
All major separatist leaders, including Hurriyat chairman Mirwaiz Umar Farooq, JKLF chief Yasin Malik, Hurriyat <i>hardliner</i> Syed Ali Shah Geelani and Shabir Shah, are in New Delhi for talks with Kasuri. Though they are meeting the Pakistani Foreign Minister separately, all of them, except Geelani, are seeking participation of the Kashmiri leadership in the ongoing peace process. Geelani, on the other hand, will reiterate his rejection of the dialogue process.
However, the attack on the train that is seen as the symbol of the peace process seems to have upset the separatist plans. "I hope that the blasts do not disrupt the peace process, " the Mirwaiz told The Indian Express. "Nevertheless, the Hurriyat will go with a positive frame of mind and share its opinion on Kashmir with Kasuri sahib." The Mirwaiz will be leading a four-member delegation, comprising Bilal Gani Lone, former Hurriyat chairman Moulana Abbas Ansari and Agha Syed Hassan. They are also counting on the fact that they will be the last to meet Kasuri on February 23. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Just a question: Why are Paki FM and Kashmiri terrorists ('separatists') meeting in New Delhi? Isn't ISI headquarters the usual place for this type of meet? Guess Indians must pswallow this with the daily psecular pill.
<b>ADDED:</b>
On a related matter,
http://www.indianexpress.com/story/23817.html
has the same story (being the original source for it)
At the top of this page of Indian Express, there's an image of two Hindu women, one crying desperately. And this image is tattoed with the text:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->'Securing India
Living with Terror and beyond'<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--> <!--emo&:furious--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/furious.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='furious.gif' /><!--endemo--> Isn't Indian Express ashamed of this cowardly advert? Is this the dhimmitude that's been brought about by psecularism (for example, with the pseculars' well-organised defense of murderous terrorist Afzal)?
Why do we need to Live with Terror? Why can't we live without terror? Why not let our security forces shoot terrorists on sight and on-site, so we can live without terror? Why do terrorists get to live, but their victims do not? I mean, the victims are not 'living with terror' are they? They only died by terror. The victims' relatives are the ones that have to live with the still-alive terrorists.
And what's with the implication that India can be Secured by Living with Terror?
What other country has declared that it must live with terror (to secure itself)? America, Britain, Australia, Spain, the Netherlands, Germany, France, Thailand, Phillipines, Russia,...? No? Why not? As far as I can recall, they're all in on the War on Terror.
So why are the pseculars in India trying to brainwash us to accept it, to learn to Live with Terror(-ists/-ism)?
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Separatists worried at impact ahead of talks with Kasuri
By IE
Wednesday February 21, 02:12 AM
The attack on the Samjhauta Express has cast a cloud over the talks Pakistan Foreign Minister Khurshid Ahmed is scheduled to have with Kashmiri separatist leaders on February 22.
All major separatist leaders, including Hurriyat chairman Mirwaiz Umar Farooq, JKLF chief Yasin Malik, Hurriyat <i>hardliner</i> Syed Ali Shah Geelani and Shabir Shah, are in New Delhi for talks with Kasuri. Though they are meeting the Pakistani Foreign Minister separately, all of them, except Geelani, are seeking participation of the Kashmiri leadership in the ongoing peace process. Geelani, on the other hand, will reiterate his rejection of the dialogue process.
However, the attack on the train that is seen as the symbol of the peace process seems to have upset the separatist plans. "I hope that the blasts do not disrupt the peace process, " the Mirwaiz told The Indian Express. "Nevertheless, the Hurriyat will go with a positive frame of mind and share its opinion on Kashmir with Kasuri sahib." The Mirwaiz will be leading a four-member delegation, comprising Bilal Gani Lone, former Hurriyat chairman Moulana Abbas Ansari and Agha Syed Hassan. They are also counting on the fact that they will be the last to meet Kasuri on February 23. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Just a question: Why are Paki FM and Kashmiri terrorists ('separatists') meeting in New Delhi? Isn't ISI headquarters the usual place for this type of meet? Guess Indians must pswallow this with the daily psecular pill.
<b>ADDED:</b>
On a related matter,
http://www.indianexpress.com/story/23817.html
has the same story (being the original source for it)
At the top of this page of Indian Express, there's an image of two Hindu women, one crying desperately. And this image is tattoed with the text:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->'Securing India
Living with Terror and beyond'<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--> <!--emo&:furious--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/furious.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='furious.gif' /><!--endemo--> Isn't Indian Express ashamed of this cowardly advert? Is this the dhimmitude that's been brought about by psecularism (for example, with the pseculars' well-organised defense of murderous terrorist Afzal)?
Why do we need to Live with Terror? Why can't we live without terror? Why not let our security forces shoot terrorists on sight and on-site, so we can live without terror? Why do terrorists get to live, but their victims do not? I mean, the victims are not 'living with terror' are they? They only died by terror. The victims' relatives are the ones that have to live with the still-alive terrorists.
And what's with the implication that India can be Secured by Living with Terror?
What other country has declared that it must live with terror (to secure itself)? America, Britain, Australia, Spain, the Netherlands, Germany, France, Thailand, Phillipines, Russia,...? No? Why not? As far as I can recall, they're all in on the War on Terror.
So why are the pseculars in India trying to brainwash us to accept it, to learn to Live with Terror(-ists/-ism)?