04-24-2007, 04:53 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-sengotuvel+Apr 22 2007, 11:09 PM-->QUOTE(sengotuvel @ Apr 22 2007, 11:09 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->sedition; waging war against the government; attempting or conspiring to wage war; collecting arms with the intention of waging war; abetting mutiny; <b>promoting enmity between different religious</b>, racial, or linguistic groups; and causing criminal intimidation.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Reading yet another report on Human Rights in India, and it is about Anti-terrorism laws in india, and it has the above as in India's sedition act. The report is dated 2006.
[right][snapback]67692[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Sengotuvel/Doc/Shiv,
I have tried pointing this out to you in the other fora. Using the very same laws you point above the Calcutta Quran Petition was filed and thrown out by the judges, who said "A court of law cannot sit judge on the words of a "holy" book".
This was back in the 80's. Times have changed, someone should try again.
Reading yet another report on Human Rights in India, and it is about Anti-terrorism laws in india, and it has the above as in India's sedition act. The report is dated 2006.
[right][snapback]67692[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Sengotuvel/Doc/Shiv,
I have tried pointing this out to you in the other fora. Using the very same laws you point above the Calcutta Quran Petition was filed and thrown out by the judges, who said "A court of law cannot sit judge on the words of a "holy" book".
This was back in the 80's. Times have changed, someone should try again.