05-30-2004, 10:57 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Mudy+May 29 2004, 03:43 AM-->QUOTE(Mudy @ May 29 2004, 03:43 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--> AJay latest on above, Have fun ----
<b>Rahul Gandhi's firm changes its website</b>
By: A Mid Day Correspondent
May 28, 2004
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Mudy, I still don't see any concrete evidence of wrong-doing. The company might be engaging in inflating its resume (and lying about the number of size of clients). It is for the other companies doing business with it to go through an independent "due deligence" process to figure out whether any business should be given to this company. Caveat Emptor. It Trustworthyness would figure prominently (mostly in the form of previous business contacts and references, stability of the entity, their current and past client lists etc.) in most professionally managed companies' buying decisions. At the first glance, this looks like trolling by Midday to see if there is something that they can ferret out. The company in question might be taking protective steps just to keep the peeping toms out of its premises. I am not ruing out the possibility that they may have something to hide, but that is not the only explanation for their actions.
<b>Rahul Gandhi's firm changes its website</b>
By: A Mid Day Correspondent
May 28, 2004
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Mudy, I still don't see any concrete evidence of wrong-doing. The company might be engaging in inflating its resume (and lying about the number of size of clients). It is for the other companies doing business with it to go through an independent "due deligence" process to figure out whether any business should be given to this company. Caveat Emptor. It Trustworthyness would figure prominently (mostly in the form of previous business contacts and references, stability of the entity, their current and past client lists etc.) in most professionally managed companies' buying decisions. At the first glance, this looks like trolling by Midday to see if there is something that they can ferret out. The company in question might be taking protective steps just to keep the peeping toms out of its premises. I am not ruing out the possibility that they may have something to hide, but that is not the only explanation for their actions.