07-18-2007, 09:00 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Does the daughters before or after this amendment would take share of liabilities to maintain the family on an equal basis? What about for the past 15 years the Son say spent X amount of money, that be divided too?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I am not a law graduate.
What son had spent is gone. But again, it depends on what kind of expenses.
If he had spent that money on fixing property, If he had taken permission or he had contract with his sister to fix it, then both share responsibility(loss/profit). If he had done on his own he will pay the price.
In case he had spent money on parentâs welfare, same will happen. Now both son and daughter would have to make decisions jointly.
Indian law is trying to overpower woman, but I feel they are giving them too much power, which is not good. In place of equality it is promoting inequality.
When it comes to taking care of parents, it is left on male child. Girls do take care but majority of the time it is emotional care not financial responsibility.
There are some incidences where parents had filed case against daughter but itâs rare.
I am not a law graduate.
What son had spent is gone. But again, it depends on what kind of expenses.
If he had spent that money on fixing property, If he had taken permission or he had contract with his sister to fix it, then both share responsibility(loss/profit). If he had done on his own he will pay the price.
In case he had spent money on parentâs welfare, same will happen. Now both son and daughter would have to make decisions jointly.
Indian law is trying to overpower woman, but I feel they are giving them too much power, which is not good. In place of equality it is promoting inequality.
When it comes to taking care of parents, it is left on male child. Girls do take care but majority of the time it is emotional care not financial responsibility.
There are some incidences where parents had filed case against daughter but itâs rare.