07-22-2007, 11:48 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-dhu+Jul 20 2007, 07:52 PM-->QUOTE(dhu @ Jul 20 2007, 07:52 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Probably, we should make a distiction between the genocides propagated by Nazism, Christism, Islamism, et al versus every Hatfield-McCoy phenomenon that we come across. Otherwise we are falling for the equal-equal psyops.
[right][snapback]71366[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->The distinction is already there naturally, we need not make it as it's quite obvious.
All earlier mass-murder, wars or conquest were merely for resources; later on they were also for power and the expansion thereof (Greek, Roman, Persian conquests). As stated however, the very early ones were merely about competition for resources. We're animals after all. And closest to chimpanzees to boot - the most advanced species when it comes to deception. Hey, not knocking our pedigree here. We (humans) have vastly improved on (surpassed) their lying capabilities. We're in a league of our own now.
But with christonazislamicommunism, ideology became a main thrust of conquering, colonizing, genociding others. How unique. Yes, search for more resources (stated in terms of riches, land, wealth, power, expansion) was always still there; but add to it the unique objective of stealing from, oppressing, enslaving or massacring unsaved people precisely for their heatheness.
No person who glances through history and the therein recorded reasoning for atrocities committed, could fail to see the difference between early historical atrocities and those particularly committed for the sake of enforcing/propagating christonazislamicommunistic ideology. Annihilation-at-all-costs is a uniquely christonazislamicommunistic bequest to humanity. I mean, christos killed native Americans who fed and looked after them, and were ready to share everything with them; only because they were heathen! Hard time imagining any empire-seeking Roman, Greek (even Alexander) or the like doing that.
Finally. Found it again. About 1800s warfare in Africa, Congo:
http://freetruth.50webs.org/A4b.htm#Congo
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Before 1874 the Congo basin was a well-populated district, inhabited by a number of uncivilised [the 2nd to last paragraph here will contrast this with 'civilisation'] tribes. <b>These tribes were engaged more or less in tribal wars, which were largely a result of contact with the whites, since they were generated and perpetuated chiefly on account of slave raids.</b>
[...]
-- Christianity, Slavery and Labour, by Chapman Cohen (1931)<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Ah, the blessings of christocolonialism.
[right][snapback]71366[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->The distinction is already there naturally, we need not make it as it's quite obvious.
All earlier mass-murder, wars or conquest were merely for resources; later on they were also for power and the expansion thereof (Greek, Roman, Persian conquests). As stated however, the very early ones were merely about competition for resources. We're animals after all. And closest to chimpanzees to boot - the most advanced species when it comes to deception. Hey, not knocking our pedigree here. We (humans) have vastly improved on (surpassed) their lying capabilities. We're in a league of our own now.
But with christonazislamicommunism, ideology became a main thrust of conquering, colonizing, genociding others. How unique. Yes, search for more resources (stated in terms of riches, land, wealth, power, expansion) was always still there; but add to it the unique objective of stealing from, oppressing, enslaving or massacring unsaved people precisely for their heatheness.
No person who glances through history and the therein recorded reasoning for atrocities committed, could fail to see the difference between early historical atrocities and those particularly committed for the sake of enforcing/propagating christonazislamicommunistic ideology. Annihilation-at-all-costs is a uniquely christonazislamicommunistic bequest to humanity. I mean, christos killed native Americans who fed and looked after them, and were ready to share everything with them; only because they were heathen! Hard time imagining any empire-seeking Roman, Greek (even Alexander) or the like doing that.
Finally. Found it again. About 1800s warfare in Africa, Congo:
http://freetruth.50webs.org/A4b.htm#Congo
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Before 1874 the Congo basin was a well-populated district, inhabited by a number of uncivilised [the 2nd to last paragraph here will contrast this with 'civilisation'] tribes. <b>These tribes were engaged more or less in tribal wars, which were largely a result of contact with the whites, since they were generated and perpetuated chiefly on account of slave raids.</b>
[...]
-- Christianity, Slavery and Labour, by Chapman Cohen (1931)<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Ah, the blessings of christocolonialism.