10-26-2007, 01:32 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Politicians are not national assets: HC </b>
PTI | New Delhi
Posted online: October 25, 2007
Observing that they were not a "national asset", Delhi High Court on Thursday took the politicians' head on over having their security guards on tow when they step out and wryly told them to remain in the confines of their homes and offices if they feel threatened by citizens.
"You should not let these men (politicians) to come out. Their presence in public places itself threatens the common men. I do not know why it has become a matter of prestige for them to move with 10-15 uniform security personnel carrying lethal weapon," a Bench comprising Justice TS Thakur and Justice Veena Birbal told the Union Government.
While hearing a PIL on police reforms seeking segregation of force into two wings to deal with law and order and Investigation independently, the court expressed its displeasure over the inconvenience the common people are to put up by the overwhelming presence of security guards accompanying politicians at public places.
In harsh remarks laced with sarcasm, the judges could not hide their dismay when they said, "if these people feel so threatened they should not come out in public places."
<b>The judges said that they (politicians) were not a national asset which should be protected and if they were, the citizens would protect and there was no need to be threatened by them (public).</b>
"It has become fashionable and a status symbol. The more people (security men) surrounds these people (politicians) the more prestigious they feel. It is obnoxious that common men are forced to stay on the sidelines and are prevented to walk on the pavements when the politicians pass through", the Court said.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
PTI | New Delhi
Posted online: October 25, 2007
Observing that they were not a "national asset", Delhi High Court on Thursday took the politicians' head on over having their security guards on tow when they step out and wryly told them to remain in the confines of their homes and offices if they feel threatened by citizens.
"You should not let these men (politicians) to come out. Their presence in public places itself threatens the common men. I do not know why it has become a matter of prestige for them to move with 10-15 uniform security personnel carrying lethal weapon," a Bench comprising Justice TS Thakur and Justice Veena Birbal told the Union Government.
While hearing a PIL on police reforms seeking segregation of force into two wings to deal with law and order and Investigation independently, the court expressed its displeasure over the inconvenience the common people are to put up by the overwhelming presence of security guards accompanying politicians at public places.
In harsh remarks laced with sarcasm, the judges could not hide their dismay when they said, "if these people feel so threatened they should not come out in public places."
<b>The judges said that they (politicians) were not a national asset which should be protected and if they were, the citizens would protect and there was no need to be threatened by them (public).</b>
"It has become fashionable and a status symbol. The more people (security men) surrounds these people (politicians) the more prestigious they feel. It is obnoxious that common men are forced to stay on the sidelines and are prevented to walk on the pavements when the politicians pass through", the Court said.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->