Historicity Of Jesus

[Guest]

<!--QuoteBegin-dhu+Dec 13 2007, 11:23 AM-->QUOTE(dhu @ Dec 13 2007, 11:23 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->


<!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->RodephEmet

The popular academics who specialize in Christian study try to prove the New Testament's veracity by showing how it fits in with the Old Testament(Brown, et al)  <b>But most scholars don't know that the Old Testament was created in order to retrofit with the New Testament. That is the primary reason that the Romans burned the torahs.</b>

People don't take Jewish scholars seriously who have explored this area. They dismiss Abelard Reuchlin's work and are afraid to be put into his category of scholarship. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

[
[right][snapback]76089[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yes,
i also wonder why Septuagint Bible is more acurate then jewish Masoretic text or protestant text despite it was writen in greek.
If we compare for exemple ,years in the patriarh list from genesis ,betwin Septuagint and other versions,we easely observ who is more acurate.
This can show when Bible was modified for the last time,or why the jews and christians have exactly the same book canon made in the same time.