02-11-2008, 04:27 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-"Naresh"+-->QUOTE("Naresh")<!--QuoteEBegin-->Could you - for the sake of my enlightenment - advise as to the route-areas to be followed if Turkmenistan and Zinjiang Natural Gas would be transported if it was to be in LNG Form by way of Marine Transportation on the High Seas?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I was refering to the Iran-Pakiland-China pipeline and not the Turkemenistan and Xinjiang pipelines. The latter two have land routes to china's east coast.
If china wants iranian natural gas there are 2 routes, one sea and other the land based. China will not opt for the sea route that's why this pipeline through pakiland is being discussed.
<!--QuoteBegin-"Naresh"+-->QUOTE("Naresh")<!--QuoteEBegin-->Regarding use of Coal : "Clean Burning of Coal" Technology already exists.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
But are the costs are so low that china can continue producing and supplying low-cost(Subsidizied) electricity.
<!--QuoteBegin-"Naresh"+-->QUOTE("Naresh")<!--QuoteEBegin-->Please read the "Energy Sector-2" Thread.
Many, Many Thanks in Advance.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Left you an message in that thread.
I was refering to the Iran-Pakiland-China pipeline and not the Turkemenistan and Xinjiang pipelines. The latter two have land routes to china's east coast.
If china wants iranian natural gas there are 2 routes, one sea and other the land based. China will not opt for the sea route that's why this pipeline through pakiland is being discussed.
<!--QuoteBegin-"Naresh"+-->QUOTE("Naresh")<!--QuoteEBegin-->Regarding use of Coal : "Clean Burning of Coal" Technology already exists.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
But are the costs are so low that china can continue producing and supplying low-cost(Subsidizied) electricity.
<!--QuoteBegin-"Naresh"+-->QUOTE("Naresh")<!--QuoteEBegin-->Please read the "Energy Sector-2" Thread.
Many, Many Thanks in Advance.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Left you an message in that thread.