Am uneasy that the end result of this tacky democratic fiasco will be that yet another republican biblical twat becomes president. "Look: no ridiculous spoilage rate by dismissing 2 million African American votes this time. The republican has now been elected 'naturally' with no (overt) cheating, unlike the last two elections when we were sadly caught playing foul". Meanwhile the vulcans can go back into overdrive in their imperial plans, and give further encouragement to their babble-toting priestie army to invade and for continuing their biblical lying about India, Indian society and Hinduism.
Not that things would be different were HC or BHO elected prez. American foreign policy is always the same.
From what I read here, BO is christo-conditioned.
If BO was genuinely interested in righting the wrongs of oppressed populations in America - that is, if he were sincere - then he would not have (1) teamed up with some racist loon or whatever that Wright fellow is; and more importantly (2) would have talked in detail about how he planned to get native Americans back to thriving on their own soil (back on track to life and prosperity).
Ignoring them is a christo-conditioned slip on his part. It's certainly too late to add this to his speeches when the glaring ommission is eventually pointed out to him. No one who sincerely cared about racism in America could ever have ignored the profundity of the importance of native Americans for improvements to America's social relations.
Going by what I understand from reading things here, BO comes off like a petty saboteur rather than someone who wants to make the best of a bad hand (America's history of genocide and slavery). As a leader of any nation, you have to have the decency to put petty thoughts of revenge behind and think of the bigger picture. One can't just throw one's hands up in the air, accept a case as hopeless and therefore take the easy road by destroying everything. That's a loser attitude and no one wants losers to rule. BO had the opportunity as an (partly) African American to bring an African American view onto solving the problem of racism and unresolved historic and present wrongs. It would have been more productive than anything the other camp (of European settler presidents) has so far offered. But no, of all the possible African Americans who could have appeared on the scene to try for president, it has to be a christo-conditioned one who predictably has thoughts of revenge. It's such a christo thing to be brainwashed into being reactively resentful that you intend to destroy everything when in a position of power.
Yes it is infuriatingly unfair - the history of slavery, colonialism, the utter non-comprehension amongst America's European settlers of the depths and breadth of the destruction they inflicted and therefore continue to inflict (to a lesser? degree) today. But actively working to non-destructively correct the unfairness and one could have hit two clay birds with one stone: (1) discovered and implemented the proper solution for correcting the situation of the oppressed populations in America (without going after the European settler population - vengeance breeds itself after all, and in the long run will benefit no one in America); (2) the success of the solution will show where the other side had gone wrong and what all was necessary to make things better. Even if the past can't be righted, the present can.
A productive solution pays for itself, destructiveness can only end in lasting misery.
Whatever America may be at present, it has the potential - like all countries do - to become better. The past only casts a shadow over the present until historical wrongs are righted, after which it becomes a valuable lesson. The goal of any leader who cares about his/her country should therefore be to better the country.
But why am I expecting any such thing from christo-conditioned characters (McCain, HC, BO - all the same)? A Deist (I mean of Paine's type), a non-christo-conditioned African American or a Traditional native American ought to stand for president. Actually, when is that last going to happen? Because more miraculous than an African American being elected president in the US is a native American one. Note how that is <i>not</i> shown even in the fictional setting of a TV show - women and African Americans have all been presidents on US TV in the last 5 to 10 years. Come on hollywood, an obscure Indian in a forum can think of it - why not anyone else, eh? (Then again, if the idea does come to them, I shudder to think of the kind of christo, possibly tie-wearing native American president they will bring onto a show ... Eeeewwwwwwwwww. That's like genociding them all over again. Rather continue to leave them out of it, then.) The reason they're not presidents on TV is because the idea is one of the deeper taboos in America, or else it is something that never even occurs to the minds of the christo-conditioned American populace. The same reasoning is behind why the native American situation is more censored than the race issue is in this presidency.
Not that things would be different were HC or BHO elected prez. American foreign policy is always the same.
From what I read here, BO is christo-conditioned.
If BO was genuinely interested in righting the wrongs of oppressed populations in America - that is, if he were sincere - then he would not have (1) teamed up with some racist loon or whatever that Wright fellow is; and more importantly (2) would have talked in detail about how he planned to get native Americans back to thriving on their own soil (back on track to life and prosperity).
Ignoring them is a christo-conditioned slip on his part. It's certainly too late to add this to his speeches when the glaring ommission is eventually pointed out to him. No one who sincerely cared about racism in America could ever have ignored the profundity of the importance of native Americans for improvements to America's social relations.
Going by what I understand from reading things here, BO comes off like a petty saboteur rather than someone who wants to make the best of a bad hand (America's history of genocide and slavery). As a leader of any nation, you have to have the decency to put petty thoughts of revenge behind and think of the bigger picture. One can't just throw one's hands up in the air, accept a case as hopeless and therefore take the easy road by destroying everything. That's a loser attitude and no one wants losers to rule. BO had the opportunity as an (partly) African American to bring an African American view onto solving the problem of racism and unresolved historic and present wrongs. It would have been more productive than anything the other camp (of European settler presidents) has so far offered. But no, of all the possible African Americans who could have appeared on the scene to try for president, it has to be a christo-conditioned one who predictably has thoughts of revenge. It's such a christo thing to be brainwashed into being reactively resentful that you intend to destroy everything when in a position of power.
Yes it is infuriatingly unfair - the history of slavery, colonialism, the utter non-comprehension amongst America's European settlers of the depths and breadth of the destruction they inflicted and therefore continue to inflict (to a lesser? degree) today. But actively working to non-destructively correct the unfairness and one could have hit two clay birds with one stone: (1) discovered and implemented the proper solution for correcting the situation of the oppressed populations in America (without going after the European settler population - vengeance breeds itself after all, and in the long run will benefit no one in America); (2) the success of the solution will show where the other side had gone wrong and what all was necessary to make things better. Even if the past can't be righted, the present can.
A productive solution pays for itself, destructiveness can only end in lasting misery.
Whatever America may be at present, it has the potential - like all countries do - to become better. The past only casts a shadow over the present until historical wrongs are righted, after which it becomes a valuable lesson. The goal of any leader who cares about his/her country should therefore be to better the country.
But why am I expecting any such thing from christo-conditioned characters (McCain, HC, BO - all the same)? A Deist (I mean of Paine's type), a non-christo-conditioned African American or a Traditional native American ought to stand for president. Actually, when is that last going to happen? Because more miraculous than an African American being elected president in the US is a native American one. Note how that is <i>not</i> shown even in the fictional setting of a TV show - women and African Americans have all been presidents on US TV in the last 5 to 10 years. Come on hollywood, an obscure Indian in a forum can think of it - why not anyone else, eh? (Then again, if the idea does come to them, I shudder to think of the kind of christo, possibly tie-wearing native American president they will bring onto a show ... Eeeewwwwwwwwww. That's like genociding them all over again. Rather continue to leave them out of it, then.) The reason they're not presidents on TV is because the idea is one of the deeper taboos in America, or else it is something that never even occurs to the minds of the christo-conditioned American populace. The same reasoning is behind why the native American situation is more censored than the race issue is in this presidency.