<!--QuoteBegin-Bharatvarsh+Apr 26 2008, 09:01 PM-->QUOTE(Bharatvarsh @ Apr 26 2008, 09:01 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Amartya Sen the most famous Indian commie who sits in the UK says:
<!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Here, we find not internal pluralism alone but external receptivity as well. Incidentally, the grammarian Panini was apparently an Afghan!
http://www.hindu.com/seta/2005/09/22/stori...92200211700.htm<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I don't know how this retard won the Nobel Prize.
Panini was from modern day Attock (or near it) which falls in Pakjab today, during Panini's time the area had no Pathans or any other Afghan groups in Attock as we have today, at that time it was under Indian influence. This moron needs to read some history.
[right][snapback]80931[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->Population of C and E Aghanistan in ancient times was completely ethnically Indian and they were specifically Hindus. (Even today many Afghans might still be ethnically Indian but many also have other ancestry such as Mongolian.) And those of far W Afghanistan used to be Iranian and Zoroastrian.
Besides, whether Panini was long ago born from what is now geographically Pakjab or Afghanistan does not matter - although Bharatavarsha is right, of course, about his birthplace having been in what centuries later would become Pakistan. But trying to connect modern Afghanistan to the Hindus of historical Uppaganistan is as preposterous as trying to tie the modern European settlers of Tasmania to the accomplishments of the original Tasmanians who lived there before the christoterrorist invasions of Australasia commenced. (In case someone does not know: it's a matter of well-known history that Tasmania's population was murdered out by faithful christoterrorists.)
Also, ever since the islamic invasions started long ago, a great many Hindu populations regularly had to escape Afghanistan after fighting disaster for as long as they could (just like they had to leave Pakistan), so who's to say that all of Panini's descendants today do not reside solely in India? Entire Hindu communities moved into the interiors of what is the smaller Indian geography of today, so it's not unlikely.
Entire Zoroastrian communities from Iran still move into India (as I have read on Iranian Zoroastrian forums, for example Derafsh Kavyani). Population shifts of Hindus due to islamiterrorism into Hindu regions of India was far greater in the past.
Besides, islamics - whether from TSP, Afghanistan, India or Bangladesh (or elsewhere) - can never claim historical Hindus or Hindu accomplishments. Just like christians of Indian ethnicity have no claim whatsoever on Hindu ancestors or accomplishments. All that is solely our inheritance. We have the same treasure as always, but fewer people to divide it amongst.
But don't worry, they still have their non-existent story-book villain jeebus and their ethically repulsive mohammed.
And just like Margaret "Airing-her-dhoti" Roy, communist Amartya Sen is but another proud card-carrying member of the christoterrorist persuasion (Indian christians regularly list him in their ranks. I do feel bad for them for not having anyone worthwhile to list, but Amartya Sen does come off mildly better than jeebus, so maybe that's something). But his christocommunism explains his christoterrorist lying. Just like christolying was what christerrorist Margaret Roy was infamously caught doing not too long ago.
<!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Here, we find not internal pluralism alone but external receptivity as well. Incidentally, the grammarian Panini was apparently an Afghan!
http://www.hindu.com/seta/2005/09/22/stori...92200211700.htm<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I don't know how this retard won the Nobel Prize.
Panini was from modern day Attock (or near it) which falls in Pakjab today, during Panini's time the area had no Pathans or any other Afghan groups in Attock as we have today, at that time it was under Indian influence. This moron needs to read some history.
[right][snapback]80931[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->Population of C and E Aghanistan in ancient times was completely ethnically Indian and they were specifically Hindus. (Even today many Afghans might still be ethnically Indian but many also have other ancestry such as Mongolian.) And those of far W Afghanistan used to be Iranian and Zoroastrian.
Besides, whether Panini was long ago born from what is now geographically Pakjab or Afghanistan does not matter - although Bharatavarsha is right, of course, about his birthplace having been in what centuries later would become Pakistan. But trying to connect modern Afghanistan to the Hindus of historical Uppaganistan is as preposterous as trying to tie the modern European settlers of Tasmania to the accomplishments of the original Tasmanians who lived there before the christoterrorist invasions of Australasia commenced. (In case someone does not know: it's a matter of well-known history that Tasmania's population was murdered out by faithful christoterrorists.)
Also, ever since the islamic invasions started long ago, a great many Hindu populations regularly had to escape Afghanistan after fighting disaster for as long as they could (just like they had to leave Pakistan), so who's to say that all of Panini's descendants today do not reside solely in India? Entire Hindu communities moved into the interiors of what is the smaller Indian geography of today, so it's not unlikely.
Entire Zoroastrian communities from Iran still move into India (as I have read on Iranian Zoroastrian forums, for example Derafsh Kavyani). Population shifts of Hindus due to islamiterrorism into Hindu regions of India was far greater in the past.
Besides, islamics - whether from TSP, Afghanistan, India or Bangladesh (or elsewhere) - can never claim historical Hindus or Hindu accomplishments. Just like christians of Indian ethnicity have no claim whatsoever on Hindu ancestors or accomplishments. All that is solely our inheritance. We have the same treasure as always, but fewer people to divide it amongst.
But don't worry, they still have their non-existent story-book villain jeebus and their ethically repulsive mohammed.
And just like Margaret "Airing-her-dhoti" Roy, communist Amartya Sen is but another proud card-carrying member of the christoterrorist persuasion (Indian christians regularly list him in their ranks. I do feel bad for them for not having anyone worthwhile to list, but Amartya Sen does come off mildly better than jeebus, so maybe that's something). But his christocommunism explains his christoterrorist lying. Just like christolying was what christerrorist Margaret Roy was infamously caught doing not too long ago.
Death to traitors.