06-03-2008, 02:49 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-shamu+Jun 3 2008, 02:23 AM-->QUOTE(shamu @ Jun 3 2008, 02:23 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Question to legal gurus:
Is it possible to turn the table around by suing INOC for trying to malign the organization that put the advertisement?
These morons should think twice before arbitrarily filing suits.
[right][snapback]82284[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I have to laugh hard when I think of these INOC morons. By filing the lawsuit against the advertisement in the first place, they have attracted the attention of more people to the issues concerning Antonia Gandhi and her family. Even those, who had not heard or seen the advertisement protesting Antonia's visit to the US have now been exposed to the controversies surrounding her regime in India. In fact, thanks to her moron sycophants, the hostility and unrest among Indian public against Antonia's autocratic regime is now becoming public knowledge, among both Indian and non-Indian communities in the west.
Instead of being pleased, I would imagine Antonia, on the contray, has now even more reasons to be annoyed and worried, because a lot of information on her and her family's ill-doings , where previously unknown to many, is being made known to the western public, because of the INOC lawsuit.
I would definitely think it worth the while for the organization that had placed the advertisement in the first place to take full advantage of the publicity generated by the lawsuit in educating the world on Antonia's autocratic and oppressive regime. In fact, the case should be presented as a classic example of the attempts by her and her group to stifle and silence any dissent againt her rule and to curb the democratic process in India.
Filing a counter-suit as a protest against the attempts of the INOC, which is a part and parcel of Antonia's oppressive regime, will serve to highlight the tendency of the Congress party under Antonia's leadership to push the country in the direction of total dictatorship.
Is it possible to turn the table around by suing INOC for trying to malign the organization that put the advertisement?
These morons should think twice before arbitrarily filing suits.
[right][snapback]82284[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I have to laugh hard when I think of these INOC morons. By filing the lawsuit against the advertisement in the first place, they have attracted the attention of more people to the issues concerning Antonia Gandhi and her family. Even those, who had not heard or seen the advertisement protesting Antonia's visit to the US have now been exposed to the controversies surrounding her regime in India. In fact, thanks to her moron sycophants, the hostility and unrest among Indian public against Antonia's autocratic regime is now becoming public knowledge, among both Indian and non-Indian communities in the west.
Instead of being pleased, I would imagine Antonia, on the contray, has now even more reasons to be annoyed and worried, because a lot of information on her and her family's ill-doings , where previously unknown to many, is being made known to the western public, because of the INOC lawsuit.
I would definitely think it worth the while for the organization that had placed the advertisement in the first place to take full advantage of the publicity generated by the lawsuit in educating the world on Antonia's autocratic and oppressive regime. In fact, the case should be presented as a classic example of the attempts by her and her group to stifle and silence any dissent againt her rule and to curb the democratic process in India.
Filing a counter-suit as a protest against the attempts of the INOC, which is a part and parcel of Antonia's oppressive regime, will serve to highlight the tendency of the Congress party under Antonia's leadership to push the country in the direction of total dictatorship.