http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/008...181761.htm
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Men and women sin in different ways: Study</b>
London (PTI): It seems hell has different ways of punishing male and female sinners, for a study claims that men are most likely to commit lustful misdeeds while women are beholden to conceit.
<b>According to the study, approved by the Vatican City, men are the ones whose souls end up being pelted with fire and brimstone while the women's souls are likely to be broken on a wheel in hell.</b>
(I don't want to tell christoislamists where they will and won't go after death - since they are in love with their heaven/hell fiction.
But Natural Traditionalists don't go to imaginary christoislami hell, however badly the christoislamists may wish it or believe in it.)
Monsignor Wojciech Giertych, personal theologian to Pope Benedict XVI and the papal household, said there was "no sexual equality" when it came to sin. "Men and women sin in different ways," he wrote in Vatican's L'Osservatore Romano.
Pride ranks only at no five for men, who are likely to have indulged in so much lust and gluttony that they are too slothful to feel angry, proud, envious or avaricious. Women, on the other hand, are not averse to lust, but are primarily occupied with pride, envy and anger. Sloth does not set in until after gluttony and avarice.
"When you look at vices from the point of view of the difficulties they create you find that men experiment in a different way from women," Monsignor Giertych was quoted by The Times as saying.
His own observations confirmed the survey, an analysis of confessional data carried out by Roberto Busa, a Jesuit priest celebrated for his computerised study of the works of St Thomas Aquinas. "Diverse cultural contexts generate diverse habits -- but human nature remains the same," he said.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->The above was found via:
http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2009/02/aft...heaven-now.html
where Nizhal Yoddha introduces Hilda Raja's comments on the above article.
Nizhal Yoddha makes a slight mistake, though, in saying:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->btw, i do believe hilda raja was born a christist, but escaped.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Hilda Raja is still a catholic. In any case, she is still a christian. Or rather, a 'heretic', as the church would say. Not the sort of christian that christianism generates as a rule. A <i>bit</i> like an Abdul Kalam of christianism in India (except Kalam leans Hindu, and she leans secular).
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Men and women sin in different ways: Study</b>
London (PTI): It seems hell has different ways of punishing male and female sinners, for a study claims that men are most likely to commit lustful misdeeds while women are beholden to conceit.
<b>According to the study, approved by the Vatican City, men are the ones whose souls end up being pelted with fire and brimstone while the women's souls are likely to be broken on a wheel in hell.</b>
(I don't want to tell christoislamists where they will and won't go after death - since they are in love with their heaven/hell fiction.
But Natural Traditionalists don't go to imaginary christoislami hell, however badly the christoislamists may wish it or believe in it.)
Monsignor Wojciech Giertych, personal theologian to Pope Benedict XVI and the papal household, said there was "no sexual equality" when it came to sin. "Men and women sin in different ways," he wrote in Vatican's L'Osservatore Romano.
Pride ranks only at no five for men, who are likely to have indulged in so much lust and gluttony that they are too slothful to feel angry, proud, envious or avaricious. Women, on the other hand, are not averse to lust, but are primarily occupied with pride, envy and anger. Sloth does not set in until after gluttony and avarice.
"When you look at vices from the point of view of the difficulties they create you find that men experiment in a different way from women," Monsignor Giertych was quoted by The Times as saying.
His own observations confirmed the survey, an analysis of confessional data carried out by Roberto Busa, a Jesuit priest celebrated for his computerised study of the works of St Thomas Aquinas. "Diverse cultural contexts generate diverse habits -- but human nature remains the same," he said.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->The above was found via:
http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2009/02/aft...heaven-now.html
where Nizhal Yoddha introduces Hilda Raja's comments on the above article.
Nizhal Yoddha makes a slight mistake, though, in saying:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->btw, i do believe hilda raja was born a christist, but escaped.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Hilda Raja is still a catholic. In any case, she is still a christian. Or rather, a 'heretic', as the church would say. Not the sort of christian that christianism generates as a rule. A <i>bit</i> like an Abdul Kalam of christianism in India (except Kalam leans Hindu, and she leans secular).