http://voi.org/koenraad-elst/lanka-the-ary...on-at-last.html
http://voi.org/koenraad-elst/lanka-the-ary...ast/page-2.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->So, the Tamil Tigers are mainly a secular-nationalist movement. At least as far as the nominally Hindu members are concerned. But there is also a Christian presence in the movement, and it has gradually gained in importance. Both LTTE ideologue Anton Balasingham and the suicide bomber who killed Indian PM Rajiv Gandhi were Christians. <b>The Sinhalese tend to see</b> the LTTE as a Christian-led and Christian-teleguided movement, which to them explains <b>"Christian" Norway</b>'s attempt to broker a peace agreement effectively legitimating Tamil rule in the north. Hence the famous cartoon showing a padre hotly denying any LTTE involvement all while a tiger's tail is showing from underneath his clerical garb. The Tiger martyrs are not cremated after the Hindu custom, but buried after the Christian fashion. Given the Sinhalese Buddhists' prior and long-standing resistance against missionary efforts at converting them, the Christian angle to the Eelam problem exacerbates the religious animosities.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->It is not merely the SL Buddhists' perception that LTTE is christian. And it is not only Anton Balasingham and Rajiv's assassin that are christian in the LTTE (- and not only Prabhakaran and his heir, unmentioned in the above). A whole host of catholic and also protestant (including new evangelical) churches and representatives are in on it, not even limited to SL. The catholic church of S India is on it too.
There is a very <i>real</i> christian drive behind the LTTE and apparently even in the aggressive conversions going on among Sinhalese now.
Anyways, whatever. Dharmics of the subcontinent continue to be swatted like flies. They all get played with only the invisible puppeteer (christianism) as the ultimate winner in every game. Game -> set -> match.
The concerned populations need to <i>try</i> to foresee the future based on the entire present-day configuration of the board and the moves already made, instead of merely focussing myopically on the present. Rome wasn't brought down in a day, but when considered from the distance of time, the path to its destruction by christianism is so clear. A series of very significant events, but whose significance in the scheme of things escaped the unfortunate Greco-Romans - it was too in their faces for them to see the bigger picture. If they had the chance to do it all over again, I don't think they'd contemplate making the same mistakes.
A theoretically easy-to-implement solution that will pay <i>huge dividends</i> to Dharmic civilisations and Dharmics: all Dharmic societies ought to boycott christianism in its entirety. <i>Entirety.</i> Teach every generation what christianism (and islamism) entails. This ought to be implemented now, while the christians don't have their own <i>declared</i> political parties in power (<- because if that ever happens, things will become like S Korea - but with the difference that unlike Korean Buddhism, India/SL are too far subverted and conditioned to bounce back: once any degree of alienation has set in, there's no regaining the lost ground to get back to the original mental state. I know Koreans. And there is <i>no</i> comparison. I'd like to think it's only because they're not victims of the sort of grand experiments that Indians have been. Unwilling -> unconscious -> still unconscious but willing. Score.)
Not that Indians - Dharmics of the subcontinent - will implement the above suggestion, of course:
- they tend to be in love with the idea that christoislamism is "also valid". It will destroy them, yet until the very end (or just before) their response will remain: it's "also valid". Have to admire the stubb.. uhhh.. the steadfastness.
- a long-drawn out and painful suicide is such a romantic way to go after all. (Hmmm, I remember now. There was a reason I generally tend not to interfere in the business of others' romances...)
http://voi.org/koenraad-elst/lanka-the-ary...ast/page-2.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->So, the Tamil Tigers are mainly a secular-nationalist movement. At least as far as the nominally Hindu members are concerned. But there is also a Christian presence in the movement, and it has gradually gained in importance. Both LTTE ideologue Anton Balasingham and the suicide bomber who killed Indian PM Rajiv Gandhi were Christians. <b>The Sinhalese tend to see</b> the LTTE as a Christian-led and Christian-teleguided movement, which to them explains <b>"Christian" Norway</b>'s attempt to broker a peace agreement effectively legitimating Tamil rule in the north. Hence the famous cartoon showing a padre hotly denying any LTTE involvement all while a tiger's tail is showing from underneath his clerical garb. The Tiger martyrs are not cremated after the Hindu custom, but buried after the Christian fashion. Given the Sinhalese Buddhists' prior and long-standing resistance against missionary efforts at converting them, the Christian angle to the Eelam problem exacerbates the religious animosities.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->It is not merely the SL Buddhists' perception that LTTE is christian. And it is not only Anton Balasingham and Rajiv's assassin that are christian in the LTTE (- and not only Prabhakaran and his heir, unmentioned in the above). A whole host of catholic and also protestant (including new evangelical) churches and representatives are in on it, not even limited to SL. The catholic church of S India is on it too.
There is a very <i>real</i> christian drive behind the LTTE and apparently even in the aggressive conversions going on among Sinhalese now.
Anyways, whatever. Dharmics of the subcontinent continue to be swatted like flies. They all get played with only the invisible puppeteer (christianism) as the ultimate winner in every game. Game -> set -> match.
The concerned populations need to <i>try</i> to foresee the future based on the entire present-day configuration of the board and the moves already made, instead of merely focussing myopically on the present. Rome wasn't brought down in a day, but when considered from the distance of time, the path to its destruction by christianism is so clear. A series of very significant events, but whose significance in the scheme of things escaped the unfortunate Greco-Romans - it was too in their faces for them to see the bigger picture. If they had the chance to do it all over again, I don't think they'd contemplate making the same mistakes.
A theoretically easy-to-implement solution that will pay <i>huge dividends</i> to Dharmic civilisations and Dharmics: all Dharmic societies ought to boycott christianism in its entirety. <i>Entirety.</i> Teach every generation what christianism (and islamism) entails. This ought to be implemented now, while the christians don't have their own <i>declared</i> political parties in power (<- because if that ever happens, things will become like S Korea - but with the difference that unlike Korean Buddhism, India/SL are too far subverted and conditioned to bounce back: once any degree of alienation has set in, there's no regaining the lost ground to get back to the original mental state. I know Koreans. And there is <i>no</i> comparison. I'd like to think it's only because they're not victims of the sort of grand experiments that Indians have been. Unwilling -> unconscious -> still unconscious but willing. Score.)
Not that Indians - Dharmics of the subcontinent - will implement the above suggestion, of course:
- they tend to be in love with the idea that christoislamism is "also valid". It will destroy them, yet until the very end (or just before) their response will remain: it's "also valid". Have to admire the stubb.. uhhh.. the steadfastness.
- a long-drawn out and painful suicide is such a romantic way to go after all. (Hmmm, I remember now. There was a reason I generally tend not to interfere in the business of others' romances...)