<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->The high class hindus are half xtian and aping western sexual mores<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Depends on where people live in Bharatam I think. Maybe in Indian tinseltowns? Is Surat one?
And even then only in glam professions: "model", "actor",...
(Though concerned Hindu parents would do well to cut off all crap TV where thoughtless people vent the air in their heads.)
<!--QuoteBegin-G.Subramaniam+Jun 17 2009, 08:52 AM-->QUOTE(G.Subramaniam @ Jun 17 2009, 08:52 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->So why is a hindu 17 year old hindu girl having a boy friend?[right][snapback]98850[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->G Sub, apparently there's many meanings to 'boyfriend', as I understand in the Indian context. I know one male Indian student in TN who was 21 or 22 years old some years back and who proudly confessed at that time that he has a "girlfriend". Turns out that the most they ever did was hold hands. Heart-attack! - I know. (Unless stealing glances is now a criminal offence as well - but that's something everyone will be pleading guilty to, I suspect.)
Oh and he writes her emails containing the occasional 'romantic' silliness (no, I didn't sneak a look at it, he let me read his words and her own). What can I say, kids are funny. But also innocent.
Thoughtless they may have been, but you need not presume the victims in the Surat gangrape case were doing anything. *In spite* of such things as:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->The police said the victim of the gang rape, a 17-year old girl from a well-do-do family in the city, was going to tuition classes early in the morning on Friday accompanied by a boyfriend when the accused in a car approached them.
<b>The accused introduced themselves as policemen and told the duo that they would have to be taken to the police station for indecency in the public as they had been found in a "compromising position" under a fly-over.</b><!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->This could be no more than intimidation. It sounds like the islamaniac poseurs were excusing themselves with how she "deserved it" for being out with a boy, alone, at her age and for being a kaffir. But Hindus are not islamaniacs. Male children are allowed and often even told to accompany female children by parents.
And while I'd certainly prefer Hindu kids and their parents and Hindu adults/society in general to exercise caution, <i>Hindu</i> males are incredibly harmless. Women could close their eyes in their company. (For instance, what's the likelihood of muslimah or christian women getting attacked by Hindu men - I mean factually; not based on communistcombat spinblogs or christian fraudster accusations for whom fact=lie? Could it be so very low because the Hindu male is actually usually innocent???)
Don't misunderstand. I'm <b>not</b> encouraging anything. I'm just saying <i>if</i> Hindu girls <i>were</i> to find themselves suddenly alone in the company of Hindu boys, >95% chance nothing remotely suspicious (let alone injurious) would happen.
I don't know what the next generations will be like, of course.
In fact, the victims in this case need not be more than good friends and he may merely have been accompanying her for her own sake. Not that it helped her (or him) in the end. But I see no need for you to jump to drastic conclusions about his or her character and do so moreover based on islamaniac accusations (are they to be believed?). And there's certainly no grounds for you/anyone to turn innocent victims into willing masterminds.
And even then only in glam professions: "model", "actor",...
(Though concerned Hindu parents would do well to cut off all crap TV where thoughtless people vent the air in their heads.)
<!--QuoteBegin-G.Subramaniam+Jun 17 2009, 08:52 AM-->QUOTE(G.Subramaniam @ Jun 17 2009, 08:52 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->So why is a hindu 17 year old hindu girl having a boy friend?[right][snapback]98850[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->G Sub, apparently there's many meanings to 'boyfriend', as I understand in the Indian context. I know one male Indian student in TN who was 21 or 22 years old some years back and who proudly confessed at that time that he has a "girlfriend". Turns out that the most they ever did was hold hands. Heart-attack! - I know. (Unless stealing glances is now a criminal offence as well - but that's something everyone will be pleading guilty to, I suspect.)
Oh and he writes her emails containing the occasional 'romantic' silliness (no, I didn't sneak a look at it, he let me read his words and her own). What can I say, kids are funny. But also innocent.
Thoughtless they may have been, but you need not presume the victims in the Surat gangrape case were doing anything. *In spite* of such things as:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->The police said the victim of the gang rape, a 17-year old girl from a well-do-do family in the city, was going to tuition classes early in the morning on Friday accompanied by a boyfriend when the accused in a car approached them.
<b>The accused introduced themselves as policemen and told the duo that they would have to be taken to the police station for indecency in the public as they had been found in a "compromising position" under a fly-over.</b><!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->This could be no more than intimidation. It sounds like the islamaniac poseurs were excusing themselves with how she "deserved it" for being out with a boy, alone, at her age and for being a kaffir. But Hindus are not islamaniacs. Male children are allowed and often even told to accompany female children by parents.
And while I'd certainly prefer Hindu kids and their parents and Hindu adults/society in general to exercise caution, <i>Hindu</i> males are incredibly harmless. Women could close their eyes in their company. (For instance, what's the likelihood of muslimah or christian women getting attacked by Hindu men - I mean factually; not based on communistcombat spinblogs or christian fraudster accusations for whom fact=lie? Could it be so very low because the Hindu male is actually usually innocent???)
Don't misunderstand. I'm <b>not</b> encouraging anything. I'm just saying <i>if</i> Hindu girls <i>were</i> to find themselves suddenly alone in the company of Hindu boys, >95% chance nothing remotely suspicious (let alone injurious) would happen.
I don't know what the next generations will be like, of course.
In fact, the victims in this case need not be more than good friends and he may merely have been accompanying her for her own sake. Not that it helped her (or him) in the end. But I see no need for you to jump to drastic conclusions about his or her character and do so moreover based on islamaniac accusations (are they to be believed?). And there's certainly no grounds for you/anyone to turn innocent victims into willing masterminds.
Death to traitors.