10-08-2009, 07:06 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-08-2009, 09:28 PM by Bharatvarsh.)
The idiot is still stuck in nodding his head to what the Indian gov't defines as "legal" quite arbitrarily.
So what if it is "illegal", i commend any Hindu who is armed whether legally or illegally, the idiot gov't has no right to take away anyones right to be armed as long as they are not criminals.
The question to be asked is, was disarming the population the norm in pre British & pre Islamic India, the answer is an emphatic no. In traditional Hindu society the right of people to be armed was recognized, it was only after the invaders established themselves that efforts got underway to disarm the population so prevent any threat of rebellion, the Muslim rulers did not have much success in this as vast tracts of rural areas were only nominally under their control, it was the British who successfully disarmed the common man & this was continued by the new brown sahib gov't.
I never got the incessant Hindu whining that Muslims have "illegal" arms, well good for them at least they know that such crappy laws don't deserve to be obeyed instead of Hindu sheep who think every unreasnonable law passed by the Indian gov't is equivalent to a lakshmana rekha. Of course ideally BJP would have repealed such archaic colonial inspired laws but since they are useless, i wish all Hindus to arm themselves regardless of what the unjust laws say.
So what if it is "illegal", i commend any Hindu who is armed whether legally or illegally, the idiot gov't has no right to take away anyones right to be armed as long as they are not criminals.
The question to be asked is, was disarming the population the norm in pre British & pre Islamic India, the answer is an emphatic no. In traditional Hindu society the right of people to be armed was recognized, it was only after the invaders established themselves that efforts got underway to disarm the population so prevent any threat of rebellion, the Muslim rulers did not have much success in this as vast tracts of rural areas were only nominally under their control, it was the British who successfully disarmed the common man & this was continued by the new brown sahib gov't.
I never got the incessant Hindu whining that Muslims have "illegal" arms, well good for them at least they know that such crappy laws don't deserve to be obeyed instead of Hindu sheep who think every unreasnonable law passed by the Indian gov't is equivalent to a lakshmana rekha. Of course ideally BJP would have repealed such archaic colonial inspired laws but since they are useless, i wish all Hindus to arm themselves regardless of what the unjust laws say.