11-14-2009, 03:51 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-14-2009, 06:35 AM by Bharatvarsh.)
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->You are absolutely correct, BV-garu. The writer of the article decries opposition to the spread of TV, Cinema and reservation simply because those doing the opposing are Muslims. On all these issues, the Muslims are right! Supporting the artifacts of modernity and discrimination against Islam is not a good thing for us.
The same thing goes for having multiple children. Many of these idiot activists seem unnecessarily concerned about Muslims having "too many" children. In fact, the BJP in Karnataka is on the point of introducing legislation to remove access to subsidies for all those who have more than 2 children. Why? Why suppress somebody else's natural urge to have children, just because we have managed to kill it off in our own community? I've never understood this stupidity. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I pretty much agree with everything except for the subsidy part which I think is bad. I don't think anyone should be forced to subsidize other peoples choices good or bad, of course that also applies to social security which subsidizes wealth from the younger generation to older people and many other subsidies which "liberals" love.
Whenever gov't subsidizes something it also starts meddling in it, marriage is a good example. If you do not want to get raped by anti male laws like 498 in India then get an iron clad prenup & never get any marriage license from some gov't employed gasbag unless you need to immigrate, marriage has nothing to do with gov't.
You know a good example of Indian gov't meddling in things that don't concern them is marriage age which is set at 18 for women & 21 for men, in many US states you can marry at 16 with parental consent but apparently the Indian gov't knows it all better & can decide when we can marry better than we ourselves can.
As for the overpopulation hysteria, let the fools believe what they want, if you can financially support the kids marry young & have as many as you want & screw the meddling retards who believe in good gov't bullshit like the sheep they are, many of them will be evolutionary dead ends with their 1 kid or no kids.
The same thing goes for having multiple children. Many of these idiot activists seem unnecessarily concerned about Muslims having "too many" children. In fact, the BJP in Karnataka is on the point of introducing legislation to remove access to subsidies for all those who have more than 2 children. Why? Why suppress somebody else's natural urge to have children, just because we have managed to kill it off in our own community? I've never understood this stupidity. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I pretty much agree with everything except for the subsidy part which I think is bad. I don't think anyone should be forced to subsidize other peoples choices good or bad, of course that also applies to social security which subsidizes wealth from the younger generation to older people and many other subsidies which "liberals" love.
Whenever gov't subsidizes something it also starts meddling in it, marriage is a good example. If you do not want to get raped by anti male laws like 498 in India then get an iron clad prenup & never get any marriage license from some gov't employed gasbag unless you need to immigrate, marriage has nothing to do with gov't.
You know a good example of Indian gov't meddling in things that don't concern them is marriage age which is set at 18 for women & 21 for men, in many US states you can marry at 16 with parental consent but apparently the Indian gov't knows it all better & can decide when we can marry better than we ourselves can.
As for the overpopulation hysteria, let the fools believe what they want, if you can financially support the kids marry young & have as many as you want & screw the meddling retards who believe in good gov't bullshit like the sheep they are, many of them will be evolutionary dead ends with their 1 kid or no kids.