12-22-2005, 10:37 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-voxindica+Dec 22 2005, 09:05 AM-->QUOTE(voxindica @ Dec 22 2005, 09:05 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Dear Admn.,
When I posted the article entitled "Natwar Singh and <i>The Hindu</i> Parallax", there were two issues in it. The first was of course, the Volker committee report indicting Natwar Singh and the second was the Indian media's predisposition. It was the second point I wanted highlighted in the title. Therefore it would have been best if you had left it as a separate '<i>thread</i>' instead of clubbing it with the general debate on the subject.
Sincerely,
Vox Indica</b>
[right][snapback]43604[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Any reason why it cannot go with "Media in India.." thread? Do you want to narrow the focus hence the need for separate thread?
I am assuming, by "The Hindu" you meant the "Red Rag" of Neo.Ravan (a.k.a N.Ram)?
When I posted the article entitled "Natwar Singh and <i>The Hindu</i> Parallax", there were two issues in it. The first was of course, the Volker committee report indicting Natwar Singh and the second was the Indian media's predisposition. It was the second point I wanted highlighted in the title. Therefore it would have been best if you had left it as a separate '<i>thread</i>' instead of clubbing it with the general debate on the subject.
Sincerely,
Vox Indica</b>
[right][snapback]43604[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Any reason why it cannot go with "Media in India.." thread? Do you want to narrow the focus hence the need for separate thread?
I am assuming, by "The Hindu" you meant the "Red Rag" of Neo.Ravan (a.k.a N.Ram)?