02-07-2010, 10:49 PM
One thing we are repeatedly told by our secular friends is that it is wrong to damn an entire community for the actions of a few. That while most terrorists are muslims , not all muslims are terrorists. If that be the case can they explain why the India muslim community and Kashmiri muslims especially have never condemned the forcible ejection of Kashmiri Pandits from their homeland ? Muslims have not taken out any major or even minor rallies condemning the atrocities against the Kashmiri Pandit community. They hav'nt even raised a voice against the genocide of the pandits. What prevented the 99% "good" muslims of India from defending the Pandits from the 1% terrorists in their community ? They could have asked the government to provide weapons so that they can shoot down the terrorists. A leading muslim intellectual has declared that the silence of the Kashmiri Civil Society in the wake of the ethnic cleansing of Kashmiri Pandits is really stunning. His articles are never published in mainstream newspapers. Why did the 99% "good" Kashmiri Muslims keep quiet when mosques were calling for the Pandits to be driven out of their homes long before it actually occurred ? The Kashmiri Muslims were neighbours to the Pandits for centuries but they did not prevent the terrorists from driving them out of their homes. Neither have the Kashmiri Muslims anytime asked for the Pandits to return home and guaranteed them protection.
Anybody who has been watching the recent controversy over Pakistani Players not being selected for the IPL are aware of Shah Rukh Khan's outburts at Pakistani players not being selected for the IPL. He feels they were badly treated. Do you recall Shah Rukh losing his cool like this at the time when Pandits were driven out ? Or after the 26/11 incidents ? Certainly not !
And given the large muslim population and their voting strength, why don't they tell the Congress party to bomb the terrorist camps in return for their votes if muslims indeed love the hindus ? Rather, is it not a fact that they have used their voting powers to ensure no party takes a bold decision against Pakistan. When Israel offered to bomb Paki nuclear reactors making fissile material for N-Bombs, Rajiv Gandhi turned down the offer.Today Pakistan has as much if not more nukes than India. Clearly he did that to appease his muslim constituency.
We need to realise that terrorism is just a strategy and not the problem itself. Terrorism is just one of the strategies used by the muslims to dominate the world and destroy the native culture of the land and replace it with the culture of Arabia. Other strategies include increasing their population by high birth rates,converting people by seducing and marrying non-muslim girls, favouring only members of their own community in economics,society and education to name a few. The fact that only 1% of muslims resort to terrorism does not mean that the rest of the muslim population are friendly to hindus or hold democracy and freedom of speech in high esteem. Its just that in any given population only a handful will be reckless and will take to violence easily. The rest would prefer to work in non-violent ways to achieve their goals. Looking the other way when acts of violence against hindus and non-muslims take place is one of the them.
None of the Pakistani cricket players or the Pakistani Musicians featured in the current "Aman Ki Asha" peace initiative have ever condemned the ethnic cleansing of the Kashmiri Pandits. We need to stop thinking that musicians and cricket players are above prejudices and cannot have hatred in their hearts for the kafirs. The hatred for kafirs is implanted in the minds of every muslims whether he be commoner,musician or cricketer.
Anybody who has been watching the recent controversy over Pakistani Players not being selected for the IPL are aware of Shah Rukh Khan's outburts at Pakistani players not being selected for the IPL. He feels they were badly treated. Do you recall Shah Rukh losing his cool like this at the time when Pandits were driven out ? Or after the 26/11 incidents ? Certainly not !
And given the large muslim population and their voting strength, why don't they tell the Congress party to bomb the terrorist camps in return for their votes if muslims indeed love the hindus ? Rather, is it not a fact that they have used their voting powers to ensure no party takes a bold decision against Pakistan. When Israel offered to bomb Paki nuclear reactors making fissile material for N-Bombs, Rajiv Gandhi turned down the offer.Today Pakistan has as much if not more nukes than India. Clearly he did that to appease his muslim constituency.
We need to realise that terrorism is just a strategy and not the problem itself. Terrorism is just one of the strategies used by the muslims to dominate the world and destroy the native culture of the land and replace it with the culture of Arabia. Other strategies include increasing their population by high birth rates,converting people by seducing and marrying non-muslim girls, favouring only members of their own community in economics,society and education to name a few. The fact that only 1% of muslims resort to terrorism does not mean that the rest of the muslim population are friendly to hindus or hold democracy and freedom of speech in high esteem. Its just that in any given population only a handful will be reckless and will take to violence easily. The rest would prefer to work in non-violent ways to achieve their goals. Looking the other way when acts of violence against hindus and non-muslims take place is one of the them.
None of the Pakistani cricket players or the Pakistani Musicians featured in the current "Aman Ki Asha" peace initiative have ever condemned the ethnic cleansing of the Kashmiri Pandits. We need to stop thinking that musicians and cricket players are above prejudices and cannot have hatred in their hearts for the kafirs. The hatred for kafirs is implanted in the minds of every muslims whether he be commoner,musician or cricketer.