Belongs in christianism (=terrorism) thread too.
www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-10861832
Christism in Tamizh Nadu and Kerala has been stealing elephants and using them in their churches and processions - can be seen in quoteblocks below.
I don't see that these "animal rights groups" who have been "lobbying for a long time for a total ban on temple elephants" go after christianism in India. Note that they're going after *temple* elephants. I.e. Hindu elephants doing Hindu things, versus the elephants kidnapped to wait on christist sheep.
But the forest officials are more specific: they have stated their intentions in such a way that they could never be after the elephants in church, since their dear friend/boss the Church is using the elephants to inculturate (to keep the flock the church has recently acquired/duped into christianism - the flock which is obviously still attached to Hindu religion and reads this core Hinduness as some universal "Indian culture" instead, because culture is what christoislamism *obviously* lacks). But note how these "forest officials" particularly want the most HINDU of rituals to do with elephants abolished: the elephant blessing the Hindu temple visitors. Because that is an even more overtly heathen practice: elephants in Kovils are decorated, worshipped and give their blessings, because they - like cows and other sacred animals - are considered, well, Sacred in the Hindu Dharmic religion. (Horses, Cows, Elephants, Snakes, Eagles, Monkeys, Dogs, etc. etc. are all considered sacred and even divine by Hindus. Just like a great many Indian plants are.)
So the Elephant blessing people is a practice that is a Big No-no in christoterrorism: they clearly can't copy the Hindu temple elephants blessings, since they absolutely can't have elephants blessing the christoterrorist sheep visiting churches. <- That would be polytheistic idolatry and hence against commandment #1. No one but the non-existent gawd may bless the sheep.
So the church does what it did with the snakes (all snake-related heathenism CAN NOT be assimilated into christianism and hence must be thwarted): BAN all heathenism that cannot be inculturated. Not merely avoid inculturating on it - No - but *Ban* it from heathen religions themselves, through pretended secularism: through the "secular" arm (i.e. cryptochristo authorities/govt) and their secular excuses ("it may hurt the elephants"). After all, the non-existent biblical gawd can't stand that somewhere on the planet there is a heathen worshipping anything other than His Non-Existence.
And the following from HK mentions how many a sacred Hindu Elephant (all Indian elephants are sacred) are now regularly kidnapped by christoterrorism and used as slaves in christianism and its inculturation routines:
www.haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?PageID=10503&SKIN=C
And a couple of comments from different parts of the HK site:
BTW, that last ("50% of Kerala christos want to revert to Hindu religion") is a quaint factoid, but of little other use: many a christoterrorist in the Roman empire eventually wanted to and did return to Hellenismos too (some even centuries after the Hellenes had decisively lost). But there's no point revisiting the story of GR's end, it is well known.
The fact is: it does not matter how many heathens there are and how small in number christianism's presence initially is. Or how many want to revert to heathenism. All that matters is christianism achieving political power (christianism always keeps trying for this, until it succeeds - century after century, if that's what it takes). Once it has attained political power, heathenism has definitively lost and one can just count down: the matter reduces to establishment of christianism through accelerated destruction of heathenism.
www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-10861832
Quote:India elephant blessings 'to stop' due to health risk
By Jill McGivering
BBC News
[image caption:] Elephants are social animals
Forest officials in the southern Indian state of Tamil Nadu have asked temple custodians to stop their elephants from blessing Hindu pilgrims.
Their concern is that the practice could be damaging the more than 50 elephants kept in Hindu temples.
(These "forest officials" are crypto christians. The proof is in their pronouncement.)
The elephants are routinely forced to touch the heads of pilgrims with their trunks as a form of blessing.
But officials say the practice could be putting the animals at risk of tuberculosis.
They say the constant exposure to as many as 500pilgrims a day may be putting the elephants at risk of contracting diseases, including tuberculosis.
In recent years, four temple elephants have died after contracting tuberculosis.
A spokesman for the department in charge of temples says it will comply with the request.
(Must be cryptochristist in christo HRCE dept that's put in charge of temple affairs in TN.)
But one right-wing Hindu group responded by saying there should be more discussion before a decision was made.
(Look how the Hindu group is "right wing" merely for asking for more discussion on the topic. If it's Hindu and opposes christianist incursions, it MUST be right wing.
Meanwhile, the virulently anti-Hindu - obviously christo - cryptos are just 'neutral' "animal rights groups" and "forest officials"<img src='http://www.india-forum.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
Some animal rights groups have been lobbying for a long time for a total ban on temple elephants.
They say elephants are very social and intelligent animals and should not be forcibly isolated.
Christism in Tamizh Nadu and Kerala has been stealing elephants and using them in their churches and processions - can be seen in quoteblocks below.
I don't see that these "animal rights groups" who have been "lobbying for a long time for a total ban on temple elephants" go after christianism in India. Note that they're going after *temple* elephants. I.e. Hindu elephants doing Hindu things, versus the elephants kidnapped to wait on christist sheep.
But the forest officials are more specific: they have stated their intentions in such a way that they could never be after the elephants in church, since their dear friend/boss the Church is using the elephants to inculturate (to keep the flock the church has recently acquired/duped into christianism - the flock which is obviously still attached to Hindu religion and reads this core Hinduness as some universal "Indian culture" instead, because culture is what christoislamism *obviously* lacks). But note how these "forest officials" particularly want the most HINDU of rituals to do with elephants abolished: the elephant blessing the Hindu temple visitors. Because that is an even more overtly heathen practice: elephants in Kovils are decorated, worshipped and give their blessings, because they - like cows and other sacred animals - are considered, well, Sacred in the Hindu Dharmic religion. (Horses, Cows, Elephants, Snakes, Eagles, Monkeys, Dogs, etc. etc. are all considered sacred and even divine by Hindus. Just like a great many Indian plants are.)
So the Elephant blessing people is a practice that is a Big No-no in christoterrorism: they clearly can't copy the Hindu temple elephants blessings, since they absolutely can't have elephants blessing the christoterrorist sheep visiting churches. <- That would be polytheistic idolatry and hence against commandment #1. No one but the non-existent gawd may bless the sheep.
So the church does what it did with the snakes (all snake-related heathenism CAN NOT be assimilated into christianism and hence must be thwarted): BAN all heathenism that cannot be inculturated. Not merely avoid inculturating on it - No - but *Ban* it from heathen religions themselves, through pretended secularism: through the "secular" arm (i.e. cryptochristo authorities/govt) and their secular excuses ("it may hurt the elephants"). After all, the non-existent biblical gawd can't stand that somewhere on the planet there is a heathen worshipping anything other than His Non-Existence.
And the following from HK mentions how many a sacred Hindu Elephant (all Indian elephants are sacred) are now regularly kidnapped by christoterrorism and used as slaves in christianism and its inculturation routines:
www.haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?PageID=10503&SKIN=C
Quote:Christianity -A bundle of fabrications and imitations
26/02/2010 22:32:15
GSK Menon's Response to the usage of 'Pagan'as a derogatory term for non-Christians in Christian writings.
Christianity is not a religion, it is a bundle of fabrications and imitations. Take the case of Christianity in India, no Christian including the Bishops and nuns prefer a Christian name, everybody wants only a Hindu name, for eg look at the names of these convert bishops - Bishop Vijay Anand, Bishop Sunil Kumar, Bishop Pradhan, Brother Dhinakaran etc etc.
The Christians refuse to call these alien gods by their correct names, instead they have borrowed names of Hindu Gods & Goddesses, for eg; Amala, Vimala, Nirmala, Parameshwar, Mahesh, etc.
(NOT borrowed. Stolen. The way some christists kept names like Dion, Diana, even though this was strictly forbidden by the early church fathers and the church.)
Nowadays they are into full scale imitation of Hindu temple rituals, rites and customs. Thus you will find christian idols being fed Hindu dishes like kheer, laddoo and these being distributed as prasad. Is there any concept of prasad in their religion ? Nowhere else in any church in the world are these being done. Remember our Hindu brothers and sisters were converted by lure and guile by ridiculing as to how our Hindu idols ate ? Should we now not ask these converts as to how their alien idols are eating Hindu dishes ?
Temple rituals like procession on elephants, use of colour umbrellas, Hindu temple musical instruments, are all being shamelessly imitated. Even Dhwajastambhams are being erected which has no connection whatsoever with this desert religion. The Dhwajastambhams that are being erected in churches are exact replicas of those found in Hindu temples.
In Tamilnadu and Andhra converts are made to carry christian idols in palanquins like in Hindu temples !
(Already said: Rome Part II.)
Hindu lamps are currently the rage in churches. The Hindu traditional lamp is a representation of the Hindu trinity of Brahma-Vishnu-Shiva, how is this being used in churches ? Most of the christian converts are embarrassed to answer this.
Caste system is immensely popular among the converts, the bishops and nuns pretending to be Brahmins. They are getting themselves be called as Swamy, Purohit, Acharya etc.
In Kerala it is a big joke, every christian convert in the Travancore area pretends to be a descendant of a Namboodiri family. Imaginary lineage claims which are unverifiable are bandied about. I once challenged a Namboodiri pretender to undergo a DNA test. He fled from the place in no time lest his actual caste and genes are deciphered !
What is the meaning in such type of characterless people calling others as Pagans/Heathens ? Do they have any locus standi to call others as Pagans/Heathens ?
(The meaning? It's core christianism. That's all there is to it. In christian terminology, "polytheistic idolaters"=thorn in the sight of the non-existent jeebusjehovallah, see Bible=the working definition what has become known as pagani/heidenen since the conversion of Europe. The "locus standi" is their bible from where the differentiation originated. This differentiation is integral to christianism.)
And a couple of comments from different parts of the HK site:
Quote:200960 elephants. That's 10 more than in Hindu Kovils as per the Beeb "news" piece above.
I have seen a palli perunnal in tsr last month in TV in which they lined up 60 elephants with Yesu thidamb.. think about that folks.
Quote:2010
Whatever we see today whether it is using elephants in festivals or singing Bhajans are all signs of desperation to hold on to their 21% population in Kerala.
According to the surveys 50% of Kerala Christians live like Hindus and wanted to come back to Hindu.
BTW, that last ("50% of Kerala christos want to revert to Hindu religion") is a quaint factoid, but of little other use: many a christoterrorist in the Roman empire eventually wanted to and did return to Hellenismos too (some even centuries after the Hellenes had decisively lost). But there's no point revisiting the story of GR's end, it is well known.
The fact is: it does not matter how many heathens there are and how small in number christianism's presence initially is. Or how many want to revert to heathenism. All that matters is christianism achieving political power (christianism always keeps trying for this, until it succeeds - century after century, if that's what it takes). Once it has attained political power, heathenism has definitively lost and one can just count down: the matter reduces to establishment of christianism through accelerated destruction of heathenism.