Afghanistan - News and Discussion

[Bharatvarsh2]

[quote name='HareKrishna' date='05 August 2010 - 12:32 PM' timestamp='1281029069' post='107769']

Afghan Women and the Return of the Taliban



Read more: http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0...z0vklfPmO7





http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0...38,00.html

[/quote]

Nice propaganda.



No coincidence that all of a sudden Western media outlets like Forbes and Time have been covering Afghan women with the waning support for the war.



They never ask if the majority of Afghan women want foreign troops there and I suspect the answer is no considering the horrific birth defects of the babies due to DU and having their families wiped out in drone strikes.



Also since when is it the West's job to police the world and impose "womens lib" at gun point on foreign countries?



http://www.forbes.com/2010/08/02/netherl...man_2.html



Most of the comments there point this out, following 2 for example:

Posted by Arrichion | 08/05/10 01:21 PM EDT

Ms. Esman you are another chickenhawk.



Where in the US constitution does it say for us to go impose our lifestyle and culture abroad, since when is it the job of the US military to "liberate" Afghan women?



Did you even ask the Afghan women whom you are using as pawns for your agenda if they like the continued presence of foreign troops in their country?



Oh right, i forgot their opinions really don't matter to upper class feministas such as yourself living in the safety of US.



Why should Dutch men murder Afghan men on the say so of feminists like you Ms. Esman?



Did you know that in the US that by law a cuckold is forced to pay CS to kids that have been proven not to be theirs through paternity testing under Lord Mansfields law?



Do you know how humiliating that is for men?



So would it be okay for Iran and China to invade America to "liberate" American men?



You think most men are still the naive saps they were a 100 years ago when women like you handed white feathers to 14 and 16 year old boys on the street to shame them into going into WW1 while the women sat at home safely?



Who are you trying to fool by bringing up women in the military when everyone knows that physical standards are lowered for women, that they do not serve in combat, that many of them get pregnant to avoid doing their job and that over 98% of the casualties have been men?



If you are so worried about the status of Afghan women go fight your own damn war along with your fellow feminists.





Posted by Arrichion | 08/05/10 01:41 PM EDT

"Forbes, what is she doing writing for you?"



She is just doing her job of propaganda.



You think its a coincidence that with waning support for the war we have been inundated with nonsense about Afghan women in our media recently, remember that Time magazine cover of the Afghan girl with her nose cut off and now this.



In our society men are expendable beasts of burden and many men still buy into the chivalry nonsense.



Remember when that plane landed in the Hudson River, in the rescue efforts they did the "women and children first" nonsense with the passive acceptance of the male passengers, even though women are supposedly equal to men. Western women want to have their cake and eat it too.



These images and propaganda about Afghan women seek to harness that self sacrificing instinct of men to incite them into killing other men in Afghanistan for the feminist agenda.



Remember that while you are out risking your life for some nebulous concept of "liberating" Afghan women your wife can cheat with impunity back home, no-fault divorce you and basically reduce you to penury through alimony and property division. I have known veterans who had this happen to them and there were no Ms. Esman's there when they put the gun to their heads and killed themselves after the humiliation.