Islamism - 7

[Husky]

First link is a must read -



Summary:

[color="#0000FF"]End August 2011, New York.

3000 "peaceful" muslims - organised by Muslim American Society, apparently famous as the sue-happy arm of CAIR (Council for American Islamic Relations (?), the PR dawaganda arm of islam in the US)

descend on the only government-owned themepark in the US, where they were already told no head-gear on certain rides. 3000 muslims are there purportedly to "celebrate" the end of Ramadan.*

Muslimahs follow their script to the letter, whine on camera that they're not allowed "because we're muslim". End result: muslim mob riot. Injure 2 policemen. 100 policemen called in. 15 people arrested.



* As Americans commenting on this and related islamic events have observed, the real reason was to make public noise, sue and get more money for jihad.[/color]





1. http://www.debbieschlussel.com/41521/amu...-of-peace/

Two park rangers were injured in the melee, prompting felony assault charges against two people arrested, officials said.



The ugly incident happened just after 1 p.m. The event was organized by the Muslim American Society of New York, and attracted 3,000 Muslims from Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx and Westchester County.

Yup, the Muslim American Society, a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, which also gave birth to Al-Qaeda, HAMAS, etc.

Peter Tartaglia, deputy commissioner of Westchester County Parks, said the Muslim American Society of New York was warned in advance of the rule barring head scarves on rides for safety reasons.



“Part of our rules and regulations, which we painstakingly told them over and over again, is that certain rides you cannot wear any sort of headgear,” Tartaglia said. “It’s a safety issue for us on rides, it could become a projectile.”



Many Muslims were given refunds as they left the park disappointed.

2. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...rides.html

31 Aug 2011: Mass brawl at theme park after Muslim women are banned from going on rides unless they remove their head scarves







At the first link, notice the Americans in the comments going on about how the muslims are pouring in (even illegally), multiplying (noting "so many baby-carriages" in the photos), deliberately draining taxpayers' money and not assimilating. They want the muslims to assimilate or go home.



Was very nearly inclined to feel sorry for the Americans.



Yet:

1. both christianism and islam do exactly the same in Bharatam and with more gusto. And are supported and funded in this by US taxpayers' money and christo/western policy on India.

Examples of organised islamic riots are popular even to American christians opposed to islam. But for an example of christianism similarly undermining the natives of India: christians "lawyers" in TN brawled with pre-determination (with sympathetic howling of christian "lawyers" in AP, apparently), all in order to prevent Hindus from having their day in court to defend their Chidambaram Kovil from being taken over by the christian government. Christians brawled for the purpose of keeping the matter - important to Hindus - hanging in limbo, without resolution.



2. So islam wants to illegally usurp America (by means of an extrapolated 'genocide') from the christian invaders who illegally usurped "America" (using definite genocide) from the native Americans?

Oh how unfair that would be.



If <500 years of christian supremacy in the US can make christianism the 'rightful' owner of the US - "one nation under gawd" as the christians claim it is - then surely some 500 years of islamic supremacy in the US can make islam the 'rightful' owner of the US too - still "one nation under gawd"?

Am I wrong? Is my logic in error somehow?

After all, christian America is founded on the "finders keepers - losers genocided" theory put to practice. If islam keeps to the same rule... how is this different?



But "Americans are so humane now". Well, native Americans were all too humane to their hostile enemies (fed, clothed and cured them) which ingrates then murdered the native Americans for their hospitality. If such people as the NA could be so horridly wronged by great evil #1 and no one can cry foul, surely great evil #1 being similarly "wronged" by great evil #2 is not something that deserves special treatment?



In India too: if christians were ever to make heathen land into a "India for christ" - which is only being accomplished by illegal and false means: lying (propaganda, framing/disappearing Hindus under false terror charges), stealing (land, inculturation, subverting the democratic process etc) and genocide (NE, Swami Lakshmanananda etc etc)

then if muslims were to use the same methods to genocide christianism in India shortly thereafter,

does anyone with any sense of fairness really care? In fact, wouldn't the heathen think that great evil #1 - which genocided heathenism - deserved to be genocided by great evil #2?





"But it's not just statistics"

Why is it only statistics or "history" when *heathens* are the victims. No it's worse in their case: it's a total silence on what happened to them. And a history whitewash. Even a downright inversion (christians still pretend their innocent sheepish forerunners were "persecuted" by the Roman empire. So that in all the noise, the world doesn't catch on how the Hellenes were systematically persecuted into extinction by christianism.)