03-29-2005, 11:50 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->why we are inequal and why Africans are still living in trees and eating each other. Since they are so old and ancient, perhaps you'd think they would've evolved by now. If you wish to have you ancestry belonging to Negroids then that is your choice, I frankly see nothing of theres in our culture, not an influence neither a racial link.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
One factor that drives "civilization" is contact with other people, flow of ideas, and yes.....the mixing of bloodlines. Why does the flora, fauna and even the original aboriginals of Australia are rather unique in many respects? Why do we find the strangest species in the Galapagos Isles......simply because they had been isolated in all respects.
The same argument holds for the Negroid Africans who were trapped in the equatorial jungles....boxed in by the seas, the Sahara and the difficult jungles. Your derision for "Africans" and racial prejudices are very apparent by now...and so is your ignorance by painting all "Africans" in a broad brush. If "African"s were so undermenschen, then what are the Egyptians, the Mali kingdom, the Berbers, the Nabatheans, ancient Zinj, Carthage (they had Semitic roots, but still)....they all had pretty ancient civilizations. They may not have been as grand as Rome or something, but they had functioning civilizations and were NOT barbarians like most of their contemporary Europeans
There were large scale migrations at the coming of the Ice age AND when the glaciers receeded..... the entire globe was affected. Every man Jack and his nosy aunt were moving about in search of better pastures.....not just caucasian men who migrated to bless this land with their "oh-so-pure-and-superior bloodline".
****
I guess you are desperate for *some* sort of association with the Caucasian race so as to offset your inferiority complex or something.... Chill out bhai, no matter what you claim, their a$$es are whiter than ours....The last time a self hating Desi used this argument to get citizenship in the US, his case was dismissed by the court on insufficent grounds. What he claimed about the Aryan-Caucasian theory is just that, a theory. It is possible that Indians and Europeans be of the same stock at some point in history, but to tout that as THE overriding matter is IMO pathetic. There's a bit of everybody in everybody... if you dig deep enough.
One factor that drives "civilization" is contact with other people, flow of ideas, and yes.....the mixing of bloodlines. Why does the flora, fauna and even the original aboriginals of Australia are rather unique in many respects? Why do we find the strangest species in the Galapagos Isles......simply because they had been isolated in all respects.
The same argument holds for the Negroid Africans who were trapped in the equatorial jungles....boxed in by the seas, the Sahara and the difficult jungles. Your derision for "Africans" and racial prejudices are very apparent by now...and so is your ignorance by painting all "Africans" in a broad brush. If "African"s were so undermenschen, then what are the Egyptians, the Mali kingdom, the Berbers, the Nabatheans, ancient Zinj, Carthage (they had Semitic roots, but still)....they all had pretty ancient civilizations. They may not have been as grand as Rome or something, but they had functioning civilizations and were NOT barbarians like most of their contemporary Europeans
There were large scale migrations at the coming of the Ice age AND when the glaciers receeded..... the entire globe was affected. Every man Jack and his nosy aunt were moving about in search of better pastures.....not just caucasian men who migrated to bless this land with their "oh-so-pure-and-superior bloodline".
****
I guess you are desperate for *some* sort of association with the Caucasian race so as to offset your inferiority complex or something.... Chill out bhai, no matter what you claim, their a$$es are whiter than ours....The last time a self hating Desi used this argument to get citizenship in the US, his case was dismissed by the court on insufficent grounds. What he claimed about the Aryan-Caucasian theory is just that, a theory. It is possible that Indians and Europeans be of the same stock at some point in history, but to tout that as THE overriding matter is IMO pathetic. There's a bit of everybody in everybody... if you dig deep enough.