04-28-2005, 04:43 PM
Could not find this in online version(s) of any newspaper, wonder why BJP does not splash such things all over its website or newsletters or something. Perhaps there is nothing new in this..
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->BJP picks 10 holes in Banerjee report
Posers to Banerjee
Did you consider the evidence that two meetings took place on the night of 26.2.2002 at the Aman Guest house at Godhra, where the conspiracy to set fire to Bogie No. S-6 of the Sabarmati express was hatched?
Did you consider the evidence that 140 liter of petrol was purchased from a nearby petrol pump on the night of 26.2.2002 and kept at Aman guest house itself?
Did you consider the evidence that one of the conspirators Salim Badam was verifying the movement of Sabarmati express at 1:30 AM on 27.2.2002 from the Godhra railway station? Since the train was running four hours late the conspirators reassembled at the Aman Guest house at 6 AM?
Did you consider the evidence that chain pulling was simultaneously executed from various compartments to get the train stopped so that the mod at the platform could indulge in stone throwing?
Did you consider the evidence of workers who have deposed about the transportation of petrol from Aman guest house to the station?
Did you consider the evidence that the conspirators entered bogie No S-7, cut open the vestibule cord between S-6 and S-7?
Did you consider the evidence the fact that burning rags were thrown into Bogies No. S-6?
Do you realise that the "accident theory" was propounded by the accused in the case and repeated by Lalu prasad yadav, you have merely stamped "lalu theory"?
Do you accept that a committee appointed by the Railways cannot go into the issue of "Consiracy"? Policing is a state subject and prevention and detection of crime on Railways is the constitutional responsiblity of the state government. Did you not realize that your report is an "extra constitutional" interrerence in the administration of justice since the trial is pending in the court?
Do you now realise that the functioning of the committee and its recommendations will eventually act as the defence for the culprits?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
BJP also asked 6 sub questions of the judge on his own functioning
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Why did you accept to head a departmental inquiry of the Raiulways on a matter where a criminal trial and a commission of inquiry are pending?
Why was the chief justice not consulted to suggest a name?
Why did you give an interim report during the election period though your term is extended till March 3
2005?
Why did you address a press conference to release your report, when a judge only submits his report and it is upto the government to release it?
How did Lalu get an advance copy of your report, who released it simultaneously from his residence in Patna?
Do you expect anyone to believe that you are unware of the fact that elections to three assemblies are being held?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->BJP picks 10 holes in Banerjee report
Posers to Banerjee
Did you consider the evidence that two meetings took place on the night of 26.2.2002 at the Aman Guest house at Godhra, where the conspiracy to set fire to Bogie No. S-6 of the Sabarmati express was hatched?
Did you consider the evidence that 140 liter of petrol was purchased from a nearby petrol pump on the night of 26.2.2002 and kept at Aman guest house itself?
Did you consider the evidence that one of the conspirators Salim Badam was verifying the movement of Sabarmati express at 1:30 AM on 27.2.2002 from the Godhra railway station? Since the train was running four hours late the conspirators reassembled at the Aman Guest house at 6 AM?
Did you consider the evidence that chain pulling was simultaneously executed from various compartments to get the train stopped so that the mod at the platform could indulge in stone throwing?
Did you consider the evidence of workers who have deposed about the transportation of petrol from Aman guest house to the station?
Did you consider the evidence that the conspirators entered bogie No S-7, cut open the vestibule cord between S-6 and S-7?
Did you consider the evidence the fact that burning rags were thrown into Bogies No. S-6?
Do you realise that the "accident theory" was propounded by the accused in the case and repeated by Lalu prasad yadav, you have merely stamped "lalu theory"?
Do you accept that a committee appointed by the Railways cannot go into the issue of "Consiracy"? Policing is a state subject and prevention and detection of crime on Railways is the constitutional responsiblity of the state government. Did you not realize that your report is an "extra constitutional" interrerence in the administration of justice since the trial is pending in the court?
Do you now realise that the functioning of the committee and its recommendations will eventually act as the defence for the culprits?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
BJP also asked 6 sub questions of the judge on his own functioning
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Why did you accept to head a departmental inquiry of the Raiulways on a matter where a criminal trial and a commission of inquiry are pending?
Why was the chief justice not consulted to suggest a name?
Why did you give an interim report during the election period though your term is extended till March 3
2005?
Why did you address a press conference to release your report, when a judge only submits his report and it is upto the government to release it?
How did Lalu get an advance copy of your report, who released it simultaneously from his residence in Patna?
Do you expect anyone to believe that you are unware of the fact that elections to three assemblies are being held?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->