When I first heard about the brutal gangrape and murder of Jyothi Singh Pandey - by one islamaniac and his obviously psecular gang (since Hindus don't associate with christo-islamaniacs, forget joining with christo-islamaniacs in crimes let alone against Hindus) -
when I first heard about that crime, I thought back on a rather similar crime in Ukraine: where a young woman was gangraped and then set on fire and succumbed to her injuries. The crime was big news in her homeland, since the criminals were IIRC related to highly placed political figures and her countrymen wanted the scum punished instead of protected.
www.smh.com.au/world/ukrainian-teen-dies-after-horrific-gang-rape-20120330-1w3po.html
Either 1. international media didn't care about her as much as they pretended to do about Jyothi Singh Pandey - consider they lavished the latter with repeated and increasingly sordidly detailed reports. OR 2. international media focused on the Indian case for entirely different purposes.
The answer is 2 of course: it's not like aliens care about Indian women more than Ukrainian women (though the case can be made for the opposite, btw).
When Jyothi's case made the international news, and after her miserable story got repeated over and over again and only gained in volume and international hysteria, I wondered why the Ukrainian case had died down so quickly: it was reported only once in a few western countries IIRC. Though I can't recall now if it ever even got coverage in the US at that time (or since).
Of course, it didn't take much longer to thereafter work out that something else was the case of the exclusive focus on Jyothi's case: that other reasons conspired to keep India's rape case in the limelight and choose to focus microscopically on other cases thereafter and then further raise it all to fever pitch by having stories of foreigners in India jump out of hotel windows for fear of being raped, by certain countries declaring that India was unsafe for women etc etc. In hindsight, it is clear that the raising of the volume was planned beforehand. There are always rape cases in modern India - increasingly infested, as it is, by alien unnatural ideologies - so international news could be sure to have fodder. Their *choice* to start discussing Indian rape cases now (but not the numerous gang-rape cases that took place in other countries and were reported locally in those countries, especially including their own backyards) was what was interesting and pointed to ulterior motives behind their interest. Clearly they did not remotely care about the victims - why then pick Jyothi and Indian victims over everyone else - but wanted to create the perception of an "Indian phenomenon" in international readers' minds. They have of course succeeded. There are IMDB threads on Disney's latest Sleeping Beauty spin off ("Maleficent") which discuss its rape symbolism, and are filled with first world people pontificating about rapes in the 3rd world and speaking of the "rape culture" in India as a given and equating this with the systematic and institutional mistreatment of women in islamic nations. Of course, in one sense they are accidentally right: the gang-rape phenomenon in India is reminiscent of the rapes in islamic countries because it is very often Indian islamaniacs (and otherwise christos and communists and seculars) that are behind Indian rape cases. Though those details have of course been conveniently concealed from the aliens pontificating, as have all news of islamics gangraping Hindoos of Harijan communities and setting them on fire - that have been taking place regularly for the many years leading up to the sudden international interest in Jyothi's case and a few other hand-selected Indian cases thereafter.
Now of course, the manufactured interest has come to the point where alien christian women invade Hindu/nationalist sites and mouth off against Hindu men defending their religion there, saying that Hindu men have no right to respond as they are just rapists and mistreat women. That is, it has been manufactured as being apparently a universally known fact that India has the most and worst rape crimes and that Indian men are evil rapists and that ultimately this means Hindu men (and their Hindu religion) is what's really to blame.
The stage-managed media frenzy and the conclusions it wanted to instill into readers is also predictably used in christian dawaganda films to evangelise Hindu women, which indicates that the whole disproportionate international focus on and sensationalising of Indian (gang) rape cases was entirely for evangelising purposes.
And now the usual foreign governments are of course also planning to turn this into the latest UN lecture to India, possibly to take the place of the "caste is slavery" proposal to the UN from a few years back, presumably because that didn't succeed quite so well in restraining India and Hindu nationalism. Getting India to flounder by dividing it on caste lines is not as powerful as splitting the atom of Hindu families by alienating one gender from another after all. Social engineering is always for a purpose. And disproportionate reporting always points to social engineering.
Some alien "converts" to Hindus' religion were immediately active in joining the alien chorus in condemning India as the exclusive rape central, having no familiarity with modern western countries themselves (which they left for India when they were young, presumably in far better days).
There was one advantage to the media criminalising Indian and particularly Hindu men: fewer chances in future that those NRIs of Hindu ancestry gallavanting overseas would bring back alien spouses (some of whom may then even have threatened to "convert" to Hindus' religion). Consequently, I didn't think it worth complaining initially, since the advantages of letting the character assassination build up weighed greater than the drawbacks. It remains an extremely great advantage. But the backlash slowly became greater still, as it's revealed itself as aiming for the heart of Hindu society by trying to drive a greater wedge between Hindu men and women than christianism's social engineering had heretofore managed. In time, more Hindus complained. So it still wasn't important to say anything.
But Hindus in general and as a whole don't seem to often read or notice international headlines on sexual violence in other countries - not as often as I do - and as a result they don't seem to see the disparity in reporting that goes on. Reading such horrid news headlines and collecting them may become imperative for Hindus in future as a means to defend themselves and their country from being singled out as a unique offender (let alone that Hinduism is in any way to blame) when the matter ends up as a means for the UN or American "diplomacy" to keep Indians esp. Hindus on the backfoot in any debate about criminality, rights infringement and religious rights/freedom from alien religions.
Repeating the actual news item of this post (its date is also relevant, especially w.r.t. the first of the set of Indian rape cases that got international media treatment):
www.smh.com.au/world/ukrainian-teen-dies-after-horrific-gang-rape-20120330-1w3po.html
when I first heard about that crime, I thought back on a rather similar crime in Ukraine: where a young woman was gangraped and then set on fire and succumbed to her injuries. The crime was big news in her homeland, since the criminals were IIRC related to highly placed political figures and her countrymen wanted the scum punished instead of protected.
www.smh.com.au/world/ukrainian-teen-dies-after-horrific-gang-rape-20120330-1w3po.html
Quote:Ukrainian teen dies after horrific gang rapePoor woman.
Date
March 31, 2012
Anna Khripunkova, Donetsk
[Photo caption:] Oksana Makar died as a result of horrific injuries suffered during an attack by three men. Photo: AP
[color="#0000FF"]A UKRAINIAN teenager has died three weeks after being set on fire in a gang rape attack that raised doubts about the competence of police.
Oksana Makar, 18, was raped by three men in their early 20s, strangled with a cord, burnt and left for dead in an attack in the southern city of Mykolayiv, investigators said.
A passer-by found Oksana after she was dumped by her attackers at an abandoned construction site.[/color] She was taken to hospital with burns over 55 per cent of her body, requiring the amputation of an arm.
She died on Thursday in a specialist hospital in the eastern city of Donetsk, the clinic announced.
The chief doctor of the Donetsk burns centre, [color="#0000FF"]Emil Fistal, said: ''Imagine: she was strangled and they [the attackers] thought she had died. So they burnt her.
''She was lying there 10 hours in the freezing cold and inhaled the byproducts of the burning.''
Prime Minister Mykola Azarov vowed that the attackers would be punished ''without compromise''.
Ukrainian media have alleged that the suspected attackers - two of whom were initially allowed to go free - are the sons of parents with strong connections to leading local officials.[/color]
The mother of one suspect used to be the head of a district in the Mykolayiv region, the regional interior ministry said.
Makar's mother posted on YouTube a harrowing video of Oksana in hospital where she raises up the stump of her arm and says she feels ''awful''.
In another disturbing video leaked to Ukrainian media, one of the suspects is shown calmly relating to investigators how the three raped Oksana and then killed her when she threatened to call police.
All three have been charged with premeditated rape and murder. Authorities say several officials from the police and local prosecutors were fired and reprimanded for initially letting the suspects go free.
AFP
Either 1. international media didn't care about her as much as they pretended to do about Jyothi Singh Pandey - consider they lavished the latter with repeated and increasingly sordidly detailed reports. OR 2. international media focused on the Indian case for entirely different purposes.
The answer is 2 of course: it's not like aliens care about Indian women more than Ukrainian women (though the case can be made for the opposite, btw).
When Jyothi's case made the international news, and after her miserable story got repeated over and over again and only gained in volume and international hysteria, I wondered why the Ukrainian case had died down so quickly: it was reported only once in a few western countries IIRC. Though I can't recall now if it ever even got coverage in the US at that time (or since).
Of course, it didn't take much longer to thereafter work out that something else was the case of the exclusive focus on Jyothi's case: that other reasons conspired to keep India's rape case in the limelight and choose to focus microscopically on other cases thereafter and then further raise it all to fever pitch by having stories of foreigners in India jump out of hotel windows for fear of being raped, by certain countries declaring that India was unsafe for women etc etc. In hindsight, it is clear that the raising of the volume was planned beforehand. There are always rape cases in modern India - increasingly infested, as it is, by alien unnatural ideologies - so international news could be sure to have fodder. Their *choice* to start discussing Indian rape cases now (but not the numerous gang-rape cases that took place in other countries and were reported locally in those countries, especially including their own backyards) was what was interesting and pointed to ulterior motives behind their interest. Clearly they did not remotely care about the victims - why then pick Jyothi and Indian victims over everyone else - but wanted to create the perception of an "Indian phenomenon" in international readers' minds. They have of course succeeded. There are IMDB threads on Disney's latest Sleeping Beauty spin off ("Maleficent") which discuss its rape symbolism, and are filled with first world people pontificating about rapes in the 3rd world and speaking of the "rape culture" in India as a given and equating this with the systematic and institutional mistreatment of women in islamic nations. Of course, in one sense they are accidentally right: the gang-rape phenomenon in India is reminiscent of the rapes in islamic countries because it is very often Indian islamaniacs (and otherwise christos and communists and seculars) that are behind Indian rape cases. Though those details have of course been conveniently concealed from the aliens pontificating, as have all news of islamics gangraping Hindoos of Harijan communities and setting them on fire - that have been taking place regularly for the many years leading up to the sudden international interest in Jyothi's case and a few other hand-selected Indian cases thereafter.
Now of course, the manufactured interest has come to the point where alien christian women invade Hindu/nationalist sites and mouth off against Hindu men defending their religion there, saying that Hindu men have no right to respond as they are just rapists and mistreat women. That is, it has been manufactured as being apparently a universally known fact that India has the most and worst rape crimes and that Indian men are evil rapists and that ultimately this means Hindu men (and their Hindu religion) is what's really to blame.
The stage-managed media frenzy and the conclusions it wanted to instill into readers is also predictably used in christian dawaganda films to evangelise Hindu women, which indicates that the whole disproportionate international focus on and sensationalising of Indian (gang) rape cases was entirely for evangelising purposes.
And now the usual foreign governments are of course also planning to turn this into the latest UN lecture to India, possibly to take the place of the "caste is slavery" proposal to the UN from a few years back, presumably because that didn't succeed quite so well in restraining India and Hindu nationalism. Getting India to flounder by dividing it on caste lines is not as powerful as splitting the atom of Hindu families by alienating one gender from another after all. Social engineering is always for a purpose. And disproportionate reporting always points to social engineering.
Some alien "converts" to Hindus' religion were immediately active in joining the alien chorus in condemning India as the exclusive rape central, having no familiarity with modern western countries themselves (which they left for India when they were young, presumably in far better days).
There was one advantage to the media criminalising Indian and particularly Hindu men: fewer chances in future that those NRIs of Hindu ancestry gallavanting overseas would bring back alien spouses (some of whom may then even have threatened to "convert" to Hindus' religion). Consequently, I didn't think it worth complaining initially, since the advantages of letting the character assassination build up weighed greater than the drawbacks. It remains an extremely great advantage. But the backlash slowly became greater still, as it's revealed itself as aiming for the heart of Hindu society by trying to drive a greater wedge between Hindu men and women than christianism's social engineering had heretofore managed. In time, more Hindus complained. So it still wasn't important to say anything.
But Hindus in general and as a whole don't seem to often read or notice international headlines on sexual violence in other countries - not as often as I do - and as a result they don't seem to see the disparity in reporting that goes on. Reading such horrid news headlines and collecting them may become imperative for Hindus in future as a means to defend themselves and their country from being singled out as a unique offender (let alone that Hinduism is in any way to blame) when the matter ends up as a means for the UN or American "diplomacy" to keep Indians esp. Hindus on the backfoot in any debate about criminality, rights infringement and religious rights/freedom from alien religions.
Repeating the actual news item of this post (its date is also relevant, especially w.r.t. the first of the set of Indian rape cases that got international media treatment):
www.smh.com.au/world/ukrainian-teen-dies-after-horrific-gang-rape-20120330-1w3po.html
Quote:Ukrainian teen dies after horrific gang rape
Date
March 31, 2012
Anna Khripunkova, Donetsk
[Photo caption:] Oksana Makar died as a result of horrific injuries suffered during an attack by three men. Photo: AP
[color="#0000FF"]A UKRAINIAN teenager has died three weeks after being set on fire in a gang rape attack that raised doubts about the competence of police.
Oksana Makar, 18, was raped by three men in their early 20s, strangled with a cord, burnt and left for dead in an attack in the southern city of Mykolayiv, investigators said.[/color]